Collaborative knowledge management supporting mars mission scientists

Tollinger, Irene; McCurdy, Michael; Vera, Alonso; Tollinger, Preston

doi:10.1145/1031607.1031614

Cited by 16 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nacenta et al [16] compared techniques for manipulating virtual objects between a tablet and ancillary displays and found that the most effective was a radar view approach, where a portion of the tablet is used to control the input space of the ancillary display. Although they provide a thorough comparison of known techniques, this study only considered the situation where the display is placed at the N position, and the control space orientation is always at 0° The problem is exacerbated when multiple users are seated around a table and it is physically difficult for everyone to be optimally oriented to one or even multiple surrounding shared display(s) (e.g., Figure 1 and [1,2,7,9,14,17,27,28]). As such, their work does not provide guidance in the more general situation where ancillary displays may be positioned anywhere around the table and/or where the control space may be at a non 0° orientation.…”

Section: Collaborative Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In many contemporary computing environments, especially those where multiple collocated displays are used collaboratively, such as in the war rooms [1,2,7,14,27,28], and in operating rooms [9,17], users and their input devices are often not located directly in front of, or oriented toward, the display of interest ( Figure 1). Technical solutions to the problem of allowing multiple participants to make input to multiple displays in such an environment have been examined by Johanson et al [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of display position and control space orientation on user preference and performance

Wigdor

Shen

Forlines

et al. 2006

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In many environments, it is often the case that input is made to displays that are positioned nontraditionally relative to one or more users. This typically requires users to perform interaction tasks under transformed input-display spatial mappings, and the literature is unclear as to how such transformations affect performance. We present two experiments that explore the impact of display space position and input control space orientation on user's subjective preference and objective performance in a docking task. Our results provide guidelines as to optimal display placement and control orientation in collaborative computing environments with one or more shared displays. ACM CHI 2006This work may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part for any commercial purpose. Permission to copy in whole or in part without payment of fee is granted for nonprofit educational and research purposes provided that all such whole or partial copies include the following: a notice that such copying is by permission of Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc.; an acknowledgment of the authors and individual contributions to the work; and all applicable portions of the copyright notice. Copying, reproduction, or republishing for any other purpose shall require a license with payment of fee to Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. ABSTRACTIn many environments, it is often the case that input is made to displays that are positioned non-traditionally relative to one or more users. This typically requires users to perform interaction tasks under transformed input-display spatial mappings, and the literature is unclear as to how such transformations affect performance. We present two experiments that explore the impact of display space position and input control space orientation on user's subjective preference and objective performance in a docking task. Our results provide guidelines as to optimal display placement and control orientation in collaborative computing environments with one or more shared displays.

show abstract

Section: Collaborative Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of display position and control space orientation on user preference and performance

Wigdor

Shen

Forlines

et al. 2006

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Examples include coordination of small groups in the medical domain [32], the use of large-displays for large-scale collaboration in NASA control rooms [15,29] and in classrooms [8]. Earlier work also considered requirements and guidelines for single display groupware in collocated collaboration [27], but little work specifically examined the role and support for hedonic aspects, "the joy of use".…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

When Joy Matters: The Importance of Hedonic Stimulation in Collocated Collaboration with Large-Displays

Novak

Schmidt

2009

Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Hedonic aspects are increasingly considered as an important factor in user acceptance of information systems, especially for activities with high self-fulfilling value for the users. In this paper we report on the results of an experiment investigating the hedonic qualities of an interactive large-display workspace for collocated collaboration in sales-oriented travel advisory. The results show a higher hedonic stimulation quality of a touch-based large-display travel advisory workspace than that of a traditional workspace with catalogues. Together with the feedback of both customers and travel agents this suggests the adequacy of using touch-based large-displays with visual workspaces for supporting the hedonic stimulation of user experience in collocated collaboration settings. The relation of high perception of hedonic quality to positive emotional attitudes towards the use of a large-display workspace indicates that even in utilitarian activities (e.g. reaching sales goals for travel agents) hedonic aspects can play an important role. This calls for reconsidering the traditional divide of hedonic vs. utilitarian systems in current literature, to a more balanced view towards systems which provide both utilitarian and hedonic sources of value to the user.

show abstract

“…The Blueboard (Russel et al 2002), and its modified version for NASA space mission scientists: the MERBoard (Tollinger et al, 2004), enables identified users to quickly display, manipulate and exchange personal information available on the network. The Dynamo (Brignull et al, 2004) further enhances this personalised information sharing capabilities by enabling several users to simultaneously "carve" their own collaborative space in the public interactive surface.…”

Section: Targeting Large Distributed Groups With Public Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A repressive system, or an environment assimilated as a monitoring system by end users, would thus not be accepted on the shop-floor. Respect of information privacy is always a very delicate point for public systems (Jancke et al, 2001;Tollinger et al, 2004). User acceptance regarding privacy issues is certainly the most sensitive and delicate aspect to be considered during the coordination and collaboration environment design.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coordination and Collaboration Environments for Production Lines: A User Acceptance Issue

Laborie¹,

Chatty

Reyterou³

Ecscw 2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The Airbus Visual Line (AVL) project, now deployed on the A380 assembly line, was propelled by the desire to foster collaboration and coordination among aeronautical Final Assembly Line teams while going beyond the simplistic -repressive concept of "andon boards" (Monden, 1993). We introduced an environment composed of large public displays and semi-public interfaces to support this collaborative process, so as to enhance team awareness and facilitate coordination among the multi-disciplinary actors. Acceptance of such a coordination system on the shop-floor is a difficult issue. The difficulty is mainly due to the increasing complexity of sub-systems to assemble, the increasing amount of teams involved, the ever-shortening time to market and the circumspection of all actors regarding a 'monitoring' system. This article proposes solutions to facilitate team acceptance in the design of highly distributed coordination environments. The acceptance challenge is developed along three major factors, information targeting, information clarity and privacy concerns. From the points it develops, this article aims at facilitating Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW) environments development in complex coordination system such as industrial production lines, building and construction sites, large naval or aeronautical maintenance contexts.

show abstract

Collaborative knowledge management supporting mars mission scientists

Cited by 16 publications

References 20 publications

Effects of display position and control space orientation on user preference and performance

Effects of display position and control space orientation on user preference and performance

When Joy Matters: The Importance of Hedonic Stimulation in Collocated Collaboration with Large-Displays

Coordination and Collaboration Environments for Production Lines: A User Acceptance Issue

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About