2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining 2007
DOI: 10.1109/cidm.2007.368905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining: From Knowledge to Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our future work includes applications of SwiftRule, e.g., in the fields of organic computing [57], collaborative knowledge discovery [58], or handwriting analysis [59]. We want to extend the techniques, e.g., by replacing the generative classifier by hidden Markov models with Gaussian output distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our future work includes applications of SwiftRule, e.g., in the fields of organic computing [57], collaborative knowledge discovery [58], or handwriting analysis [59]. We want to extend the techniques, e.g., by replacing the generative classifier by hidden Markov models with Gaussian output distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By fusing this kind of automatically extracted knowledge with the combined, qualitative knowledge of several experts it would be possible to obtain more comprehensive knowledge about an application area. We proposed the concept of such a KD & DM technique, Collaborative Knowledge Discovery (CKD), in [2]. A CKD system not only acquires more comprehensive knowledge, but also experience (knowledge about knowledge), meaning that it is able to explain automatically extracted rules to the human experts and to assess the interestingness (e.g., novelty or utility) of these rules.…”
Section: Collaborative Knowledge Discovery and Data Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This task is very difficult: Different experts may come to different conclusions, i.e., labels. If an active data mining system is used (see, e.g., the one we described in [2]), it should be aware of its current knowledge and it should pro-actively ask human experts for their assistance. Thus, the classifier-and in particular the decision boundaries between different classes-can be iteratively refined by fusing the experts' knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among relevant work published after CRISP-DM, particularly interesting are the RAMSYS methodology for remote collaborative KDD efforts (Moyle and Jorge, 2001), the knowledge exchange perspective of (Diamantini et al, 2006), and the knowledge fusion model of (Horeis and Sick, 2007). The ASUM-DM methodology (Haffar, 2015) of IBM is also relevant, being an augmented version of CRISP-DM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%