Collaborative Design: From Concept to Application

Danesi, Frédéric; Gardan, Nicolas; Gardan, Yvon

doi:10.1109/gmai.2006.13

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These tools improve efficiency, like PDM systems in particular, but there is still no interoperability since STEP, as an example, is far away from supporting interactions. We have found these tools are useful after implementing different industrial tests [33]. To manage projects, we set up in our team a software environment with a portal (Collaborative Portal Server-www.nuxeo.com) with Autovue for collaborative visualisation and a PDM (Smarteam from Dassault Systèmes) for data exchange and storage.…”

Section: Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

P4LM: A methodology for product lifecycle management

Danesi

Gardan

et al. 2008

Computers in Industry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

P4LM: A methodology for product lifecycle management

Danesi

Gardan

et al. 2008

Computers in Industry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…It is acknowledged that the continuing advances in manufacturing technologies must be better supported throughout the design process [1][2][3] in order to improve the quality and chronology of manufacturing planning and execution. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) require ways to improve their product development process in order to satisfy customer demands for high quality products in shorter lead times [3][4][5]. Integrating predictive methods for manufacturing planning within the design process has the potential to satisfy this requirement as digital manufacturing methods can be used for process validation as well as the capture of production critical knowledge within the digital domain.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tolerance aware product development using an enriched hybrid digital mock up

Friel

Butterfield

Robinson

et al. 2020

CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Current practice in three-dimensional (3D) part construction and product assembly within a digital mock-up (DMU) is based on the nominal sizing of geometry. This approach does not reflect real part dimensions when they are manufactured or the assembly conditions as they come together during the final build. The value of virtual assembly planning (VAP) using clash and gap detection is therefore limited to modelling error identification within the computer-aided design (CAD) domain for nominal conditions only. VAP could become a significantly more powerful tool if the 3D representation of components within the DMU were more representative of 'as manufactured' dimensions. This paper presents the evolution and validation of an enriched DMU (EDMU) introducing the concept of the hybrid assembly which represents components in sizes which can range between upper and lower dimensional limits in addition to the nominally defined form. The resulting capability has been exploited to enable a designer to perform tolerance analysis in the CAD domain in advance of manufacturing planning, allowing tolerance consideration earlier in the design process as the DMU evolves. This has the potential to reduce the time, effort and computational load associated with the application of statistical tolerance analysis by methods engineers later in the product development cycle when the costs associated with change are higher.

show abstract

“…In the current design processes, collaboration is an intrinsic characteristic, particularly in the context of multidisciplinary design [6,7]. In fact, the design process is moving towards collaborative design process, which requires and encourages collaborations between designers from the beginning of product life cycle [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%