2020
DOI: 10.3390/pr8111465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative Control Applied to BSM1 for Wastewater Treatment Plants

Abstract: This paper describes a design procedure for a collaborative control structure in Plant Wide Control (PWC), taking into account the existing controllable parameters as a novelty in the procedure. The collaborative control structure includes two layers, supervisory and regulatory, which are determined according to the dynamics hierarchy obtained by means of the Hankel matrix. The supervisory layer is determined by the main dynamics of the process and the regulatory layer comprises the secondary dynamics and cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 (BSM1), an anoxic–oxic treatment process simulation configured for nitrogen removal . As a simulation, the BSM1 benefits from well-defined influent patterns, a simple process configuration, and precise performance evaluation metrics, which enable the direct comparison of different control strategies. The BSM1 is also well suited to the evaluation of model-free RL agents, which almost exclusively require a computer simulation in order to reach sufficient training requirements before being transferred to a physical environment, known as the simulation-to-real (Sim2Real) transfer. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 (BSM1), an anoxic–oxic treatment process simulation configured for nitrogen removal . As a simulation, the BSM1 benefits from well-defined influent patterns, a simple process configuration, and precise performance evaluation metrics, which enable the direct comparison of different control strategies. The BSM1 is also well suited to the evaluation of model-free RL agents, which almost exclusively require a computer simulation in order to reach sufficient training requirements before being transferred to a physical environment, known as the simulation-to-real (Sim2Real) transfer. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, MPC algorithms make it possible to obtain excellent control quality in the case of Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) processes with constraints. As a result, MPC methods have been used to numerous industrial processes [7], e.g., chemical reactors [8], distillation columns [9], waste water treatment plants [10], solar power stations [11], cement kilns [12], pasteurization plants [13] and pulp digesters [14]. In addition to that, MPC algorithms are more and more popular in other areas; example applications are: fuel cells [15], active vibration attenuation [16], combustion engines [17], robots [18], synchronous motors [19], mechanical systems [20], freeway traffic congestion control [21] and autonomous driving [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools are related to several levels of the DCS, involving data acquisition solutions (level 0), primary control loops (level 1), as well as estimation (software sensors) and advanced control algorithms (level 2)-Figure 1. The need for such software tools and emulators is obvious as the implementation of advanced control techniques in WWTPs is quite poor [26,27]. In many cases, only empirical rules and primary controllers (PID, on/off) are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%