2008 42nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems 2008
DOI: 10.1109/ciss.2008.4558519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative autocorrelation-based spectrum Sensing of OFDM signals in cognitive radios

Abstract: A simple and efficient spectrum sensing scheme for Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) signals of primary user in cognitive radio systems is proposed in this paper. A detector exploiting the well-known autocorrelation property of cyclic prefix (CP) based OFDM signals is developed. The proposed scheme is then extended to the case of many secondary users collaborating in order to detect the primary user in the face of shadowing and fading. The amount of information each user sends to other users or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a perfect Fourier series representation of the signal shown in Figure 3 requires infinitely many Fourier coefficients. The autocorrelation-based detector of [17] and the cyclostationarity detector of [22] are compared in [24] for detection of an OFDM signal in AWGN. The results show that the cyclostationarity detector using two cyclic frequencies outperforms the autocorrelation detector, but that the autocorrelation detector is superior when only one cyclic frequency is used.…”
Section: Detectors Based On Cyclostationaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, a perfect Fourier series representation of the signal shown in Figure 3 requires infinitely many Fourier coefficients. The autocorrelation-based detector of [17] and the cyclostationarity detector of [22] are compared in [24] for detection of an OFDM signal in AWGN. The results show that the cyclostationarity detector using two cyclic frequencies outperforms the autocorrelation detector, but that the autocorrelation detector is superior when only one cyclic frequency is used.…”
Section: Detectors Based On Cyclostationaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that [66] also takes reporting errors to the fusion center into account. In addition to energy detection, autocorrelation-based and cyclostationarity detection have also been used in combination with censoring [22], [24]. These works consider a soft decision rule, under a NP setting with a communication rate constraint per radio.…”
Section: Censoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to energy detection, autocorrelation-based and cyclostationarity detection have also been used in combination with censoring [22], [24]. These works consider a soft decision rule, under a NeymanPearson setting with a communication rate constraint per radio.…”
Section: B Censoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The autocorrelation-based detector of [17] and the cyclostationarity detector of [22] are compared in [24], for detection of an OFDM signal in AWGN. The results show that the cyclostationarity detector using two cyclic frequencies outperforms the autocorrelation detector, but that the autocorrelation detector is superior when only one cyclic frequency is used.…”
Section: B Detectors Based On Cyclostationaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these methods exploit properties of the autocorrelation of the received signal in different ways. They have been derived based on theoretical system models using more or less ideal assumptions, and the performance of these methods have been evaluated in simulations using channel models with a varying degree of realism [2,3,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%