2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chc.2019.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative and Integrated Care for Adolescent Depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 4 participants did not attend any sessions. Previous studies have shown that integrating behavioral health services into primary care is feasible and effective for treating depressed youth as compared to providing usual care (Kodish et al, 2019;Richardson et al, 2014); however, collaborative care models primarily focus on providing traditional forms of treatment (e.g., psychotherapy or psychiatric medication) rather than holistic approaches. Thus, the current study extends the current collaborative care model by the integration of a holistic treatment approach in a collaborative care setting.…”
Section: Acceptability Of Mbsgs In Primary Carementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only 4 participants did not attend any sessions. Previous studies have shown that integrating behavioral health services into primary care is feasible and effective for treating depressed youth as compared to providing usual care (Kodish et al, 2019;Richardson et al, 2014); however, collaborative care models primarily focus on providing traditional forms of treatment (e.g., psychotherapy or psychiatric medication) rather than holistic approaches. Thus, the current study extends the current collaborative care model by the integration of a holistic treatment approach in a collaborative care setting.…”
Section: Acceptability Of Mbsgs In Primary Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Collins et al, 2010) Moreover, providing behavioral health treatment in primary care allows for improved communication between medical and behavioral health staff regarding co-occurring health problems and medication management. (Asarnow, Rozenman, Wiblin, & Zeltzer, 2015;Crowley & Kirschner, 2015) Integrating behavioral health services like depression screening, psychotherapy, and prescription medication is encouraged by professional agencies such as the American Academy of Pediatrics (A. H. Cheung et al, 2007;Amy H. Cheung, Zuckerbrot, Jensen, Laraque, & Stein, 2018), and collaborative care models have shown to be associated with improved health outcomes; (Kodish, Richardson, & Schlesinger, 2019) however, research indicates that a substantial amount of youth do not utilize treatment services. (O'Connor et al, 2016) Thus, innovative programming for adolescent depression treatment in primary care is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, depression diagnosis and treatment are inadequate among pediatric populations as the limited numbers of specialists makes it challenging to access care [64,65]. Primary care is an ideal setting to manage pediatric depression as this population is cared for by a family medicine or pediatric team, allowing for routine assessments and greater opportunity for intervention [66].…”
Section: Special Considerations For Treating Depression In the Pcmh: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple models of care have been proposed for treating depression in youth including co-location, coordinated care, and integrated care. While these models can increase access to and engagement with behavioral health services for pediatric populations, collaboration between providers is necessary to positively impact depression outcomes [66,67]. Improving collaboration with the limited specialty mental health providers results in improved depression care despite personnel shortages.…”
Section: Special Considerations For Treating Depression In the Pcmh: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative studies have assessed barriers and facilitators in implementing integrated MH services into primary care around multiple issues. At the systemlevel these included supportive legislative/policy environment [25,54], availability of appropriate resources [55], preexisting relationships between specialized MH services and primary care [22,56], and adequate incentives [25,[57][58][59]. Organizational-level issues included clinician acceptance of the model [60,61], team stability [55], organizational support [1,62,63], leadership [55,62], and feedback on model effectiveness [59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%