Collaboration with community connectors to improve primary care access for hardly reached people: a case comparison of rural Ireland and Australia

Abstract

Background This study presents a way for health services to improve service access for hardly reached people through an exploration of how staff can find and collaborate with citizens (referred to as connectors) who span socio-cultural boundaries in their community. The study explored the local socio-cultural contexts of connectors’ boundary spanning activities and if they are health related; boundary spanning occurring between connectors and health professionals at the interface of health systems and community; and the opportunities and barriers to actively seeking out and collaborating with community connectors to access marginalised and hardly reached people. Methods We conducted a qualitative case comparison from rural Ireland and Australia. Following purposive snow-ball sampling techniques to recruit participants, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 34 community informants, 21 healthcare staff and 32 connectors. Transcripts were coded and analysed using an inductive approach to ascertain categories and overall themes. Results We found a diverse sample of connectors relating to heterogenous, small and locally distinct groups of hardly reached people. Overall 26 connectors were active at the interface between health services and the community, with variation in how this occurred between cases. The majority (21) described one or more health related activities with hardly reached people. All connectors expressed a willingness to develop a relationship with local health services on issues they identified as relevant. Barriers to collaborations between connectors and health services related to bureaucracy, workload, and burnout. Conclusions Collaborating with connectors has potential as one strategy to improve access to health services for hardly reached people. To enact this, health staff need to identify local socio-cultural boundaries and associated connectors, facilitate two-way connections at the boundary between health services and community and enable collaboration by attending to activities in the community, at the interface between health services and community, and within the health system.

‘If you want something to happen, you have to do it yourself’: Understanding rural Australian's perspectives of health volunteering

“…The importance of flexibility was also raised in this study as an accommodating factor, countering many of the barriers preventing rural health volunteering participation found in this study. Flexibility appears to be a facilitator in other Australian literature, which outlines how health volunteer availability and service expectation mismatch increases burnout, 40 and how models of health care developed by metropolitan policy makers tend to create roles that are inflexible in the rural setting. 41 In addition to service culture, external supports raised by participants in this study that are known to facilitate successful volunteering include training, funding, 36 service collaboration, 29 and mentoring.…”

Challenges faced by community connectors: lessons learned from a Taiwan public health initiative

“…However, across the literature on community connectors, interpersonal dynamics and steps taken to promote community outreach are not often explored. Namely, the ability for community connectors to gain community confidence is often presumed or deemed a prerequisite to community connectors’ involvement [ 23 – 25 ].…”

Community co‐produced mental health initiatives in rural Australia: A scoping review

“…28 While these seem to complement government-funded public health services, an ongoing challenge is how to integrate initiatives generated in and by communities with the formal health regime. 48 Powell et al 18 highlighted the tensions where communities might be dissatisfied with their relationships with government or NGO funders, but reliant on them for ongoing funding.…”