Collaboration of Profile Matching and MCDM-AHP Methods on Employee Selection for Promotion

Abstract

To give appreciation to every employee who has been able to understand the journey of the system in a company, it is appropriate to be given appreciation in the process of changing leadership and as a form of motivation for all employees in the company as a form of promotion. The promotion process must be carried out objectively, so that a good leadership change system can be seen as a strength in the company's survival for each period. The process of changing leadership through promotions is at the forefront of running a sustainable company. With so many employees, the biggest obstacle that often becomes crucial is how to select the leadership relay holder through promotions in the company that can be carried out objectively, thus a method is needed. worthy to be used as a benchmark for selecting employees in terms of promotion. There is a method that can be used for employee selection as a form of promotion, namely the profile matching method through the assessment of the weight of the Aspects and the magnitude of the GAP value with the concept of determining the largest rank as the winner in the selection process for promoted employees. Of the six employees who are appointed as candidates for leadership candidates through promotions, they will be selected consistently with a number of criteria as a barometer of the selection process. The results obtained through the promotion of positions in the leadership change process were the first rank was elected KR02 (4.67), followed by the second rank KR01 (4.65) and the third rank KR05 (4.46). Thus, it can be said that the combination of profile matching and MCDM-AHP methods can be used to carry out the employee selection process as a form of promotion.

Edukasi Orangtua Terhadap Bahaya Gadjet Bagi Anak di Desa Segaralangu

“…Koneksi sosial: gadget memungkinkan anak-anak untuk terus terhubung dengan teman dan keluarga, terutama dalam situasi-situasi di mana pertemuan langsung sulit dilakukan. Media sosial dan aplikasi pesan instan mendukung interaksi sosial (Dewi et al, 2019;Akmaludin et al, 2022).…”

Combining Analytical Hierarchy Process Method - Profile Matching Method for the Best Dean’s List Selection

“…The matrix comparison between the criterion values in this study is following the concept of the analytical hierarchy process method with equation (1). Where the criteria value scale is given based on the level of importance of the criteria in The matrix comparison value in Table 7 shows that the GPA obtained criterion has a slightly more important value than the Subject Taken and Repeated subject criteria, while the subject took criteria have an important value that is close to the repeated subject criteria.…”

Untitled

“…Meanwhile, [20] used file matching to select training instructors. and [21] combined the AHP and profile matching methods to determine the list of the best deans; [22] also combined the AHP and profile matching methods to select students for the Olympics; [23] combined the AHP method and profile matching for employee selection and promotion; and [24] utilized the PROMETHEE method to monitor and evaluate the performance of flight instructors. From the explanation of previous research, it was found that there were various methods used to assist in solving the problem, but determining the important level of each criterion weight on the CPI in previous research was not tested for the value of consistency, so in this study, we used the AHP approach to test consistency and determine the weight of the importance level of each criterion.…”