Learning Design
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27360-3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaboration in Learning Design Using Peer-to-Peer Technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in other ways LD appeared to be very ambitious in some aspects of social learning. In Halm, Olivier, Farooq & Hoadley, (2005) we found the peer-to-peer model of collaborative learning to be beyond the boundaries of our current thought. If LD can accommodate that decentralised kind of learning, it should have little problem with the issues surrounding group organisation and operation.…”
Section: Extend Ld Specifications In Services For Collaborative Learningmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, in other ways LD appeared to be very ambitious in some aspects of social learning. In Halm, Olivier, Farooq & Hoadley, (2005) we found the peer-to-peer model of collaborative learning to be beyond the boundaries of our current thought. If LD can accommodate that decentralised kind of learning, it should have little problem with the issues surrounding group organisation and operation.…”
Section: Extend Ld Specifications In Services For Collaborative Learningmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Another possibility is a schema with functions and information completely distributed to the courseware objects of each learner. Both schemata were introduced for the original LD specification included on a single state transition machine that manages all learners [13] and on a P2P network in which the distributed engines assigned to individual learners exchange information regarding the learning sequence [14]. Although the central server schema was used in this investigation, each schema must have different advantages and drawbacks in terms of scalability and flexibility.…”
Section: Implementation Case: Jigsaw Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6(b)), and an intermediate schema in which both a central server and courseware objects are responsible for managing learner status and learning sequence. In fact, the original LD specification has been implemented in several ways, including on a single state transition machine that manages all learners [12] and on a P2P network in which the distributed engines assigned to individual learners exchange information regarding the learning sequence [13]. Because of these differences, the implementation schemata would impact the scalability of the system and the effectiveness of implementing management functionality.…”
Section: ) Function To Aggregate and Control Information For Collabomentioning
confidence: 98%