2017
DOI: 10.1080/13629395.2017.1398904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaboration gone awry: The formation of women’s shelters as public institutions in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, their ongoing efforts to search for reliable supports were identified as crucial aspects of women's processes of change. As demonstrated by previous research in Turkey (Ekal, 2017), the narratives revealed how it was difficult and demanding for women to obtain the help that they needed, but how women were resourceful in fighting against these barriers.…”
Section: Decision-making and Safety In A Disempowering Contextmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Besides, their ongoing efforts to search for reliable supports were identified as crucial aspects of women's processes of change. As demonstrated by previous research in Turkey (Ekal, 2017), the narratives revealed how it was difficult and demanding for women to obtain the help that they needed, but how women were resourceful in fighting against these barriers.…”
Section: Decision-making and Safety In A Disempowering Contextmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Only the think tanks that have close links to the ruling government are invited to participate in policy processes (European Commission, 2020: 14). 3 The system remains effectively closed to actors that are "critical" of government policies (Doyle, 2017;Ekal, 2019;Orhan, 2018: 143). 4…”
Section: Basics Of the Policy Advisory Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These think tanks have been seen as "partisan think tanks"(Orhan, 2018: 2 based on Yıldız, 2013.4 Policies on environmental policies and gender, for example, are two areas widely discussed in the literature, and with regard to which the system is closed to actors who are critical of government policies(Doyle, 2017;Ekal, 2019;Orhan, 2018).14 CHANGING POLICY ADVISORY DYNAMICS IN THE 2000S: THE ADVISORY……”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, while the government has collaborative relationship with Islamic women's organizations, it excludes a variety of feminist women's organizations ( Doyle, 2017 ). A case in point is the government's effectively hijacking the agenda item on women's shelters (which had helped bring the issue of violence against women to the government's agenda, and therefore, which would potentially politicize the issue) originally set by feminist organizations ( Ekal, 2017 ). A similar picture emerges with respect to environmentalist organizations, where the government disregards court orders to stop the execution of mining or other energy investments due to environmental concerns ( Özen andÖzen, 2009 , 2010 ;Kadirbeyoglu, 2005 ).…”
Section: Role Of Societal Actors In Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%