Collaboration Between Protective Services and Law Enforcement:

Msw, Donna M. Reulbach; Jd, Jane Tewksbury

doi:10.1300/j084v06n02_02

Cited by 12 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, sex offender treatment has benefited from partnerships with the private sector (Faller and Henry, 2000;McGrath et al, 2002;Olson, 1985;Shapiro and Rinaldi, 2001). Child custody and child protection cases (Gould, 1999;Reulbach and Tewksbury, 1994) as well as outbreaks of school violence (Tapper et al, 1997) have also been addressed via multi-agency collaborative efforts.…”

Section: Partneringmentioning

confidence: 99%

The threat of mission distortion in police‐probation partnerships

Murphy

Worrall

2007

Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies &Amp; Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose -The growth of formal police-probation partnerships in the USA has been accompanied by an increased awareness of the potential threats of mission distortion. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the dynamics of mission distribution Design/methodology/approach -The paper is based on interviews with police and community corrections officers involved in an active partnership in Spokane, Washington. The paper emphasizes the abuse of authority, stalking horse incidents, and the scope of legitimate police and probation authority. Findings -Ultimately, mission distortion has the potential to undermine the credibility of police-probation partnerships. Originality/value -The paper offers training and policy recommendations for police and community corrections administrators.

show abstract

Section: Partneringmentioning

confidence: 99%

The threat of mission distortion in police‐probation partnerships

Murphy

Worrall

2007

Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies &Amp; Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, in Middlesex County in Massachusetts, interagency protocols were developed and cross-training was provided for police and adult protective services workers beginning in 1988 (Reulbach & Tewksbury, 1994). Hazewski (1998) reported that the office of the Attorney General in Delaware was awarded a grant in the mid-1990s to hire a special advocate/investigator to assist victims of elder abuse and to improve coordination between law enforcement agencies and adult protective services.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Throughout most of the 1980s, criminal justice professionals and adult protective services workers in Middlesex County were unable to understand or to communicate with one another. The net result was that abusive behavior in families often escalated until victims were seriously injured or their lives were threatened (Reulbach & Tewksbury, 1994). Data collected by Dolon and Blakely (1989) suggested that this situation may have been present in many other parts of the nation.…”

Section: Criminal Justice and Adult Protective Services In The 1980s mentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptions of Adult Protective Services Workers of the Support Provided by Criminal Justice Professionals in a Case of Elder Abuse

Blakely

Dolon

2000

Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper summarizes results of a 1997 survey of adult protective services workers in 43 states. The survey yielded ratings of police and victim assistants in detecting and treating elder abuse and estimates of the likelihood that criminal justice professionals would provide ten forms of assistance in a case of elder abuse. Respondents also reported the most helpful services supplied by criminal justice professionals, the services that were most difficult to obtain, and overall ratings of criminal justice professionals in cases of elder abuse. Findings provide insights about relationships between adult protective services workers and criminal justice professionals.

show abstract

“…Sex offender treatment in particular has benefited from partnerships with the private sector (Faller and Henry 2000;McGrath, Cumming, and Holt 2002;Olson 1985;Shapiro and Rinaldi 2001). Child custody and child protection cases (Gould 1999;Reulbach and Tewksbury 1994) as well as outbreaks of school violence (Tapper, Kleinman, and Nakashian 1997) have also been addressed via multiagency efforts.…”

Section: Collaboration In Criminal Justicementioning

confidence: 99%

Funding Collaborative Juvenile Crime Prevention Programs

Worrall

2004

Eval Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Panel data were analyzed to determine whether funding for collaborative juvenile crime prevention programs reduced arrests in California counties. Because the data were a population (i.e., all 58 counties in the state), regression results were summarized descriptively, and special attention was given to the direction and magnitude of key coefficients. Funding was associated with little to no overall reductions in arrests for felonies, misdemeanors, and status offenses. However, estimates of arrests prevented varied across each of the 14 counties that received funding.

show abstract

Collaboration Between Protective Services and Law Enforcement:

Cited by 12 publications

References 0 publications

The threat of mission distortion in police‐probation partnerships

The threat of mission distortion in police‐probation partnerships

Perceptions of Adult Protective Services Workers of the Support Provided by Criminal Justice Professionals in a Case of Elder Abuse

Funding Collaborative Juvenile Crime Prevention Programs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About