Collaboration between non-governmental organizations and public services in health – a qualitative case study from rural Ecuador

Abstract

BackgroundNon-governmental organizations (NGOs) have a key role in improving health in low- and middle-income countries. Their work needs to be synergistic, complementary to public services, and rooted in community mobilization and collective action. The study explores how an NGO and its health services are perceived by the population that it serves, and how it can contribute to reducing barriers to care.DesignA qualitative exploratory study was conducted in remote Ecuador, characterized by its widespread poverty and lack of official governance. An international NGO collaborated closely with the public services to deliver preventative and curative health services. Data were collected using focus group discussions and semistructured interviews with purposively sampled community members, healthcare personnel, and community health workers based on their links to the health services. Conventional qualitative content analysis was used, focusing on manifest content.ResultsEmerging themes relate to the public private partnership (PPP), the NGO and its services, and community participation. The population perceives the NGO positively, linking it to healthcare improvements. Their priority is to get services, irrespective of the provider's structure. The presence of an NGO in the operation may contribute to unrealistic expectations of health services, affecting perceptions of the latter negatively.ConclusionsTo avoid unrealistic expectations and dissatisfaction, and to increase and sustain the population's trust in the organization, an NGO should operate in a manner that is as integrated as possible within the existing structure. The NGO should work close to the population it serves, with services anchored in the community. PPP parties should develop a common platform with joint messages to the target population on the provider's structure, and regarding partners’ roles and responsibilities. Interaction between the population and the providers on service content and their expectations is key to positive outcomes of PPP operations.

Hospital pharmacy workforce in Brazil

“…On the other hand, non-profit organizations tended to spend more money on human resources, perhaps as they are not aiming for profit. Non-profit organizations have recognizable contributions to improve public health all over the world [ 35 – 37 ], and in the perspective of pharmacist workforce in Brazil, it appears to be an advantage, perhaps indicating that they see the benefit of integrating pharmacists into their multidisciplinary teams.…”

Effectiveness and Challenges in Local Self-Governance: Multifunctional Autonomy in Japan

“…As an aging society is inevitable, the solutions for current problems should be approached through collaboration with various internal and external organizations, including private companies and non-profit organizations that are interested in community organizing [ 17 , 31 ]. In this context, the availability of multiple resources and functions can reduce the burdens associated with LSG, such as accessibility and availability of resources for lives [ 32 , 33 ]. This process can successfully involve stakeholders in each community and in the local government, which can increase citizens’ empowered activities for others and improve health conditions in rural communities [ 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”

Collaboration between the government and nongovernmental organizations in providing health-care services: A systematic review of challenges

“…Involved organizations refuse to easily accept the plans and priorities of the other party and resist the collaboration. [ 28 40 42 46 52 ] For instance, despite the preference of Sudan government for the participation of NGOs in establishing health-care facilities, NGOs tend to directly provide health services. [ 52 ]…”

“…The ambiguity and unawareness of roles and responsibilities make both the parties operate in collaborative activities and programs without considering the tasks and limitations of the other party, which also leads to an activity overlap in some cases. [ 40 41 44 47 51 ]…”