Collaboration and integrated water resources management: A literature review

Abstract

Collaboration has been widely recognized as a critical driver for the achievement of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) outcomes; aiming at safeguarding economic, social, and environmental interests within a basin. This paper reviews research on collaboration and its relationship with IWRM. It focuses on the following aspects: (a) when collaboration is needed; (b) frameworks of collaboration; (c) benefits and costs; (d) stakeholder engagement and collaboration; and (e) stakeholder engagement mechanisms for an IWRM. This research reinforces that collaboration has been recognized internationally by multiple agencies and authors as a critical element for IWRM. However, most of the research on collaboration has been focused more on qualitative rather than quantitative aspects, with a special emphasis on benefits over costs. Therefore, future research can further analyze the costs and benefits under a quantitative perspective, in order to evaluate and understand the impact of a collaborative process and support decisions about to what extent collaboration should be undertaken.

Hydropower benefit-sharing and resettlement: A conceptual review

“…The adoption of the 1992 Dublin Principles was a milestone for the global water agenda, which stressed collaboration and participation [99,100]. Other dominant concepts, such as 'nexus-thinking' or 'integrated water resources management' (IWRM) similarly emphasise integrated management of water in all its forms, involving diverse water user groups, and taking into account multiple spatial and temporal scales [101][102][103].…”

“…For example, the collaborative approach between developers, project-affected people, and governments aligns well with the normative ideals of participation described above (cf. [101]). Yet, putting these ideas into practice has proven to be a complex and often problematic undertaking (see e.g.…”

The role of stakeholder engagement in sustainable water resource management in South Africa

“…On the other hand, functional commitment revolves around policy implementation, capacity‐building and learning (Viennet et al, 2017). Functional involvement into water governance is grounded in the interrelations and interdependence of various stakeholders in the water sector (Galvez and Rojas, 2019). Wilson et al (2016) edify this observation by arguing that the functional participatory approach enables authorities to use a “people‐friendly” strategy, by granting the civic institutions, such as NGOs and other grass‐roots organizations, a meaningful role in water governance through meaningful discussion on how to improve water governance in South Africa and the world as a whole.…”

El Manejo Integrado de los Recursos Hídricos en el acuífero insular de Cozumel, Quintana Roo, México

“…De acuerdo con la Organización de las Naciones Unidas, el sexto objetivo del desarrollo sostenible plantea la implementación del MIRH en todos los niveles para el año 2030. Actualmente, la definición más citada y aceptada en trabajos publicados sobre el MIRH es la propuesta por la Asociación Mundial Para el Agua (Benites, 2017;Galvez & Rojas, 2019), estableciendo que:…”