1999
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8500.00105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaboration and Integrated Services in the NSW Public Sector

Abstract: The paper discusses some of the findings of a review of whole-of-government activities in the NSW public sector conducted for the NSW Premier's Department. Some major sources of the difficulties people encounter in whole-of-government initiatives are identified, together with some factors essential for success. Since there is no one 'right' model for whole-ofgovernment activity, criteria are proposed for identifying the most appropriate whole-ofgovernment response to different types of problem. In conclusion t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst there is an emergent discourse about the need for “joined‐up government” in the UK, “horizontal government” in Canada and “whole‐of‐government” programmes in Australia to tackle increasingly intractable and multi‐faceted problems, it is also clear that such initiatives do not easily fit with current departmental structures of government. For example, in a recent review of whole‐of‐government initiatives within the Australian context, Vincent (1999) notes that these types of initiatives are, by their very nature, “at the edge” and not in the mainstream of the public sector's dominant mode of operating. Hence,… the difficulties faced by whole‐of‐government initiatives often result from a fundamental and perhaps inevitable tension between them and the structural and systemic framework within which they operate.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst there is an emergent discourse about the need for “joined‐up government” in the UK, “horizontal government” in Canada and “whole‐of‐government” programmes in Australia to tackle increasingly intractable and multi‐faceted problems, it is also clear that such initiatives do not easily fit with current departmental structures of government. For example, in a recent review of whole‐of‐government initiatives within the Australian context, Vincent (1999) notes that these types of initiatives are, by their very nature, “at the edge” and not in the mainstream of the public sector's dominant mode of operating. Hence,… the difficulties faced by whole‐of‐government initiatives often result from a fundamental and perhaps inevitable tension between them and the structural and systemic framework within which they operate.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus on building interpersonal relations can cause participants to lose sight of concrete goals (Helling, 1998). It is not always evident that such collaborative practices as case management are cost effective (Vincent, 1999).…”
Section: Collaboration and Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizations must proceed carefully, though, recognizing the potential pitfalls. For example, organization structures that reward staff for specific agency purposes, and budgeting and accounting evaluation systems that direct policies through individual agencies rather than across agencies frustrate collaboration (Vincent, 1999). The focus on building interpersonal relations can cause participants to lose sight of concrete goals (Helling, 1998).…”
Section: Collaboration and Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I agree with Vincent (1999) who argues on the basis of a review of whole-of-government initiatives in NSW that redesigning government agency structures to bring together related services should be a model of last resort:…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%