2017
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/pyjwh
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaboration against ethnography: How colonial history shaped the making of an ethnographic film

Abstract: What happens when a commitment to collaborative ethnographic filmmaking runs up against a community's ambivalence towards its own history? This paper provides an ethnohistorical account of the making of the film Please Don't Beat Me, Sir!, exploring how colonial-era "police ethnographies" and contemporary communal politics shape the collaborative endeavor. The film was made in collaboration with Budhan Theatre, an activist theater troupe from the Chhara community in the Indian city of Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The C… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the scene developed through improvisation, it became clear that its inclusion didn't need to be instrumental to the narrative but, rather, could offer something more nuanced: an exploration of the kind of everyday encounter African nationals living in Khirki face. Participation in a scene like this offered, as Friedman (2013, 392) writes regarding improvisational, shared cinema, “a space within which the film's subjects (both on‐screen and off) can negotiate the manner of their own cultural representation.” In this case, the film's subjects were, with the exception of Jason, not present. Rather, it was a cast of Mozambican, Nigerian, and Indian amateur actors based in Pune who were negotiating the cultural representations of others, based on their own understandings of the encounter and its context.…”
Section: Scene 1: the Photomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the scene developed through improvisation, it became clear that its inclusion didn't need to be instrumental to the narrative but, rather, could offer something more nuanced: an exploration of the kind of everyday encounter African nationals living in Khirki face. Participation in a scene like this offered, as Friedman (2013, 392) writes regarding improvisational, shared cinema, “a space within which the film's subjects (both on‐screen and off) can negotiate the manner of their own cultural representation.” In this case, the film's subjects were, with the exception of Jason, not present. Rather, it was a cast of Mozambican, Nigerian, and Indian amateur actors based in Pune who were negotiating the cultural representations of others, based on their own understandings of the encounter and its context.…”
Section: Scene 1: the Photomentioning
confidence: 99%