2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colistin susceptibility testing by Etest and disk diffusion methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
86
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
12
86
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides testing colistin susceptibility by Vitek 2 compact system, the disc diffusion method using 10 μg disc was also done (≤ 12 mm = resistant and ≥ 14 mm = susceptible) [16]. Since neither the current CLSI nor EUCAST provided disc diffusion zone diameter breakpoints for colistin against Acinetobacter spp., and since both recommended that colistin testing should be performed by dilution method and interpreted according to MIC, colistin susceptibility disc diffusion results were compared against broth microdilution method (as a reference method) [ …”
Section: Disc Diffusion Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides testing colistin susceptibility by Vitek 2 compact system, the disc diffusion method using 10 μg disc was also done (≤ 12 mm = resistant and ≥ 14 mm = susceptible) [16]. Since neither the current CLSI nor EUCAST provided disc diffusion zone diameter breakpoints for colistin against Acinetobacter spp., and since both recommended that colistin testing should be performed by dilution method and interpreted according to MIC, colistin susceptibility disc diffusion results were compared against broth microdilution method (as a reference method) [ …”
Section: Disc Diffusion Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colistin susceptibility was also performed using a disk diffusion method. 43 Stool samples from healthy food animal farm workers, water samples, and swabs from fresh and cooked foods, healthy food animals, and fresh pork meat samples were inoculated onto MacConkey agar, MacConkey agar supplemented with ceftriaxone, mannitol salt agar (selective for Staphylococci), and enterococcal agar supplemented with vancomycin [selective for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species (VRE)]. The inoculated plates were incubated at 35uC for 24 hours.…”
Section: Bacterial Culture and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conjugation experiment was carried out in mixed-broth cultures as previously described (15), and rifampin-resistant Escherichia coli EC600 (LacZ Ϫ Nal r Rif r ) was used as the recipient strain. The MICs of meropenem, imipenem, ertapenem, colistin, tigecycline, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, and amikacin were determined by the Etest technique (AB bioMerieux, Sweden) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the susceptibility breakpoints were interpreted as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and previous reports (5,9). Plasmid pKP048 from strain KP048 was completely sequenced by using a shotgun approach (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%