Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps

Abstract

Background and Objective: Endoscopic polypectomy is an excellent tool for colon cancer prevention. With the innovation of novel resection techniques, the best method is still being investigated. Hence, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) versus hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for colorectal polyp resection. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, WOS, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL until July 16, 2022. We pooled dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) with the corresponding CI. This review’s protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022347496. Results: We included 18 randomized controlled trials with a total of 4317 patients and 7509 polyps. Pooled RR favored HSP regarding the complete resection rate (RR: 0.96 with 95% CI: 0.95, 1, P = 0.03) and local recurrence incidence (RR: 5.74 with 95% CI: 1.27, 25.8, P = 0.02). Pooled RR favored CSP regarding the colonoscopy time (mean difference: −6.50 with 95% CI: −7.55, −5.44, P = 0.00001) and polypectomy time (mean difference: −57.36 with 95% CI: −81.74, −32.98, P = 0.00001). There was no difference regarding the incidence of immediate bleeding (P = 0.06) and perforation (P = 0.39); however, HSP was associated with more incidence of delayed bleeding (P = 0.01), abdominal pain (P = 0.007), and postresection syndrome (P = 0.02). Discussion: HSP is associated with a higher complete resection and lower recurrence rates; however, HSP is also associated with a higher incidence of adverse events. Therefore, improving the complete resection rate with CSP still warrants more innovation, giving the technique safety and shorter procedure duration.