Di erential phenological responsesPlant phenology is shifting as a result of global warming (IPCC, 2019). General trends include advanced spring phenology (i.e., earlier budburst and leaf-out) and delayed leaf senescence, leading to an extended leaf-on period and possibly increased growth (Peñuelas et al., 2009;IPCC, 2019;Piao et al., 2019). However, responses vary among species, e.g., those with early spring phenology-referred to here as early season species-often show more pronounced advances in spring phenology (Abu-Asab et al., 2001;Beaubien and Hamann, 2011;Shen et al., 2014) than so called late season species. As global warming progresses, these among-species differences in leaf-on time or green-cover season may increase (Morin et al., 2009;Montgomery et al., 2020), leading to an expectation of possible changes in ecosystem structure and function (Polgar et al., 2014;Primack and Gallinat, 2016).The annual development of plants in boreal and temperate regions is driven by the seasonal cycle of climatic conditions, although species-specific information about these changes is often lacking. Bud set, leaf senescence, and dormancy are induced by shorter daylength and lower temperatures in fall, while spring phenology is controlled primarily by temperatures, i.e., low chilling temperatures in fall and winter for dormancy release and high forcing temperatures for spring growth initiation (Chuine et al., 2016;Piao et al., 2019). As species chilling needs can be fulfilled long before spring arrives (see Figure 1), spring phenology is often not influenced by changes in cumulative winter chilling induced by global warming (