2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cold region river discharge uncertainty—estimates from large Russian rivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
94
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
94
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Provisional estimates, made using techniques developed by Shiklomanov et al (2006), indicate that the 2008 annual river discharge to the Arctic Ocean from the Russian rivers was significantly greater than the long-term mean but lower than the historical maximum observed in 2007 (Fig. 5.15).…”
Section: S106mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Provisional estimates, made using techniques developed by Shiklomanov et al (2006), indicate that the 2008 annual river discharge to the Arctic Ocean from the Russian rivers was significantly greater than the long-term mean but lower than the historical maximum observed in 2007 (Fig. 5.15).…”
Section: S106mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The missing November 1997 value was reconstructed by selecting analogous years with similar October discharge values at MARR. Uncertainties in annual discharge for the Mackenzie are likely similar to those from the large Russian rivers (Ob, Yenesey, Lena) which are less than 6% for annual discharge, approximately 20% for winter discharge, and near 10% during spring months when ice is present (Shiklomanov et al, 2006). Historical height data for the major Mackenzie basin lakes (used to assess their buffering capacities) are available from Environment Canada (http://scitech.pyr.ec.gc.ca/waterweb/main.asp).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, it is important to add new data to the rating curves over time to maintain reliable estimates of river discharge. When the rating curves are not updated regularly, uncertainty in the discharge estimates gradually increases (Shiklomanov et al, 2006). Unfortunately, the quality of discharge data for downstream gauges on the major Russian Arctic rivers is decreasing because the rating curves for these rivers are not being adequately updated.…”
Section: Past and Ongoing Efforts To Monitor River Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%