36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 1998
DOI: 10.2514/6.1998-475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cold flow investigation of the flow acoustic coupling in solid propellant boosters

Abstract: This paper deals with an analysis of the flow instabilities in the Ariane 5 solid propellant booster.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recirculation bubble behind the inhibitor develops over an axial distance of x= h D 6:2, where h is the inhibitorheight. Anthoine et al 37 have carried out an experimental investigation with an inhibitornozzle distance, such as l= h D 27, and have shown that the length of the recirculation bubble behind the inhibitor is approximately equal to 12h. For the shorter inhibitor-nozzle distance used in this numerical simulation (l= h D 8), the recirculation bubble is, of course, limited to 8h.…”
Section: Mean Flowmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recirculation bubble behind the inhibitor develops over an axial distance of x= h D 6:2, where h is the inhibitorheight. Anthoine et al 37 have carried out an experimental investigation with an inhibitornozzle distance, such as l= h D 27, and have shown that the length of the recirculation bubble behind the inhibitor is approximately equal to 12h. For the shorter inhibitor-nozzle distance used in this numerical simulation (l= h D 8), the recirculation bubble is, of course, limited to 8h.…”
Section: Mean Flowmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the nozzle without a cavity, the recirculation bubble behind the inhibitor extends over the whole space between the obstacle and the nozzle because x=h D 8 is smaller than 12 and reattaches on the nozzle head. 37 Velocity pro les are plotted in Fig. 18 for both velocity components and for the two nozzles with and without a cavity.…”
Section: Mean Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the SRM problem, if one is interested in the nature of the flow one second after ignition, one must interrogate the solution at t ¼ 1=b seconds of simulation time, since the slow time has been accelerated by a factor of b. And, if one is interested in vortex-shedding dynamics (from an inhibitor, say, see Sutton and Biblarz [18] and Anthoine et al [1]) one second after ignition, this will correspond to the simulated evolution (at the simulating time scale) evaluated again at t ¼ 1=b seconds, but the variation of these dynamics (e.g., changes in shedding frequency) will occur b times faster.…”
Section: Discussion and Generalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the second test case is to re-visit the experimental work of Anthoine et al [10] on the zero-flow acoutic characterization of a typical solid propellant booster. This axisymmetric test facility consists of a contoured nozzle with a throat diameter of 30 mm, a section diameter of 76 mm and a booster length (L = 405 mm).…”
Section: Test-case 1: 1-dof Mechanical Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the difficulties of predicting acoustic resonance using analytical or numerical methods, much of the work has been conducted experimentally, similar to the shaker excitations used for modal extraction in structural engineering. A classical approach to establish possible links between observed instabilities and acoustic resonances is based on white-noise excitation of the component under study and the filtering of acoustic resonance frequencies by using loudspeakers [10][11][12][13][14]. In many cases, such experimental simple acoustic characterization may well provide crucial information about flow-induced resonant sound generation during operating conditions [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%