2022
DOI: 10.2174/1574893617666220114141705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COL1A1 as a Potential Prognostic Marker and Therapeutic Target in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract: Background: Nowadays, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a common and highly fatal malignancy in worldwide. Therefore, to identify the potential prognostic markers and therapeutic targets is urgent for patients. Objective: This study aims to find hub targets associated with NSCLC using multiple databases. Methods: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from Genome Expression Omnibus (GEO) cohorts were employed for the enrichment analyses of Gene Ontology (GO) terms and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 42 Among collagens, type I is the most prominent within the ECM and has a crucial role in sustaining the lung’s overall structure 43 ; furthermore, COL1A1 serves as a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target in lung cancer. 44 In our work, the biological role of COL1A1 in multiple low-dose radiation exposures was further validated by the bioinformatics analyses of lung cancer public databases, a series of biological experiments, and clinical sample research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“… 42 Among collagens, type I is the most prominent within the ECM and has a crucial role in sustaining the lung’s overall structure 43 ; furthermore, COL1A1 serves as a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target in lung cancer. 44 In our work, the biological role of COL1A1 in multiple low-dose radiation exposures was further validated by the bioinformatics analyses of lung cancer public databases, a series of biological experiments, and clinical sample research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%