2017
DOI: 10.3280/tr2016-079008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Col-azioni. Pratiche di convivialità per la rigenerazione degli spazi pubblici

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The legacy of this thought can now be revitalized thanks to the spreading of practices of appropriation, use and care of the neighbourhoods' residential areas proximity spaces. These spaces have been undergoing enhancement and redesign in the wake of numerous projects based on the active participation of residents (Cognetti & Conti, 2012;Lambertini, Metta & Olivetti, 2013;Metta & Olivetti, 2016). The question of the rears of buildings opens up to notso-trivial design issues that can shake up the composition principles of these areas and even the relations between the internal, intimate and private spaces of lodgings with the open spaces, promoting the care and activation of places that otherwise risk to remain vague, penalized by their indefinite design.…”
Section: Three Possible Design Research Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The legacy of this thought can now be revitalized thanks to the spreading of practices of appropriation, use and care of the neighbourhoods' residential areas proximity spaces. These spaces have been undergoing enhancement and redesign in the wake of numerous projects based on the active participation of residents (Cognetti & Conti, 2012;Lambertini, Metta & Olivetti, 2013;Metta & Olivetti, 2016). The question of the rears of buildings opens up to notso-trivial design issues that can shake up the composition principles of these areas and even the relations between the internal, intimate and private spaces of lodgings with the open spaces, promoting the care and activation of places that otherwise risk to remain vague, penalized by their indefinite design.…”
Section: Three Possible Design Research Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%