2022
DOI: 10.1109/tdsc.2020.3043366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CoinLayering: An Efficient Coin Mixing Scheme for Large Scale Bitcoin Transactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently, it is not applicable for the large-scale E-voting system, because on one hand the smaller size anonymous set cannot support strong anonymity for E-voting and on the other hand the large computation overhead degrades the efficiency of voting. For this, we have proposed a scalable coin mixing scheme [26,27], which breaks down the trading process into transferring stage and paying stage. e former deposits the transaction Bitcoins on a specified middleman (termed as holding Mixer) and further cuts off the link between these Bitcoins and the seller; the latter specify another middleman (termed as Paying Mixer) to advance the Bitcoins to buyer and then pay back the Bitcoins to this middleman after the mixing is over.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, it is not applicable for the large-scale E-voting system, because on one hand the smaller size anonymous set cannot support strong anonymity for E-voting and on the other hand the large computation overhead degrades the efficiency of voting. For this, we have proposed a scalable coin mixing scheme [26,27], which breaks down the trading process into transferring stage and paying stage. e former deposits the transaction Bitcoins on a specified middleman (termed as holding Mixer) and further cuts off the link between these Bitcoins and the seller; the latter specify another middleman (termed as Paying Mixer) to advance the Bitcoins to buyer and then pay back the Bitcoins to this middleman after the mixing is over.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the issue of protecting transaction privacy in blockchain, there have been several relevant studies [9][10][11], mainly focusing on two approaches: direct privacy protection and indirect privacy protection. Indirect privacy protection methods employ indirect means to protect transaction privacy, mainly through techniques such as coin mixing [12], ring signature [13], and stealth address [14]. Direct privacy protection methods directly hide transaction information and are mainly based on zero-knowledge proof.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%