2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2019.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coil combination methods for multi-channel hyperpolarized 13C imaging data from human studies

Abstract: Effective coil combination methods for human hyperpolarized 13 C spectroscopy multi-channel data had been relatively unexplored. This study implemented and tested several coil combination methods, including 1) the sum-of-squares (SOS), 2) singular value decomposition (SVD), 3) Roemer method by using reference peak area as a sensitivity map (RefPeak), and 4) Roemer method by using ESPIRiT-derived sensitivity map (ESPIRiT). These methods were evaluated by numerical simulation, thermal phantom experiments, and hu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will still result in increased image quality, however, without intensity correction. 39,40 The phantom results share a trend with the simulations, in the sense that theoretic pre-calibrated reconstructions resulted in the highest image quality, and auto-calibrated A single oblique slice (close to the coronal plane) is shown, cropped to focus on the kidneys and interpolated to an isotropic voxel size of 2.5 mm. Pyruvate and lactate images are shown interleaved, as acquired, with the first image being of lactate for the fully sampled acquisitions (FS), and the first being of pyruvate for the undersampled acquisitions (US).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This will still result in increased image quality, however, without intensity correction. 39,40 The phantom results share a trend with the simulations, in the sense that theoretic pre-calibrated reconstructions resulted in the highest image quality, and auto-calibrated A single oblique slice (close to the coronal plane) is shown, cropped to focus on the kidneys and interpolated to an isotropic voxel size of 2.5 mm. Pyruvate and lactate images are shown interleaved, as acquired, with the first image being of lactate for the fully sampled acquisitions (FS), and the first being of pyruvate for the undersampled acquisitions (US).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…For phantoms with signal non‐uniformity and for in vivo imaging, auto‐calibrated coil sensitivities need to be based on the sum‐of‐squares normalized image to divide out object contrast. This will still result in increased image quality, however, without intensity correction …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the setting of advanced prostate cancer, early (6 weeks) after effective androgen deprivation therapy, there was a significant early reduction in k PL that receded changes in mp- 1 H MRI and predicted clinical response ( Figure 3 ). 107 Comparison with current state-of-the-art imaging modalities such as 1 H MRI is key to determining the added value of HP 13 C MRI, and with current HP 13 C MRI studies expanding to metastatic sites within the body, [108] , [109] the synergy of HP MRI with currently used PET probes will also need to be investigated.
Figure 3 Representative axial T 2 -weighted anatomic image and corresponding water apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) image and T 2 W image with an overlaid pyruvate-to-lactate metabolic flux ( k PL ) image and corresponding HP 13 C spectral array for a 52-year-old prostate cancer patient with extensive high-grade prostate cancer (A) before therapy and (B) 6 weeks after initiation of androgen ablation and chemotherapy.
…”
Section: Translation To Patients With Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both healthy volunteer data sets, multichannel data were pre-whitened 31 and then coil combined using pyruvate to estimate the coil weights. 32 For analysis, the peak dynamic SNR and area under the curve (AUC) ratio were determined for each metabolite. Peak dynamic SNR was calculated as the maximum voxel signal from each metabolite timecourse divided by the standard deviation of the noise, which was obtained from a timeframe and slice where no signal was present.…”
Section: Reconstruction and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%