1986
DOI: 10.1093/ije/15.1.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohort Study Analysis with a FORTRAN Computer Program

Abstract: We describe the analysis of cohort study data with a standard FORTRAN program which should run on most computers. It provides a summary measure of the mortality (or incidence) rate ratio between the study cohort and some standard population, based either on person-years at risk or on proportional mortality, and adjusted for age, sex and calendar period; a test of the statistical significance of the ratio; and a set of observed death rates in the study cohort. Results may also be produced in a form suitable for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard mortality ratios are calculated as recommended in the literature (5,6). The reference death rates are published by the INSERM, at the national or regional level (95 French districts).…”
Section: Case-contol Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard mortality ratios are calculated as recommended in the literature (5,6). The reference death rates are published by the INSERM, at the national or regional level (95 French districts).…”
Section: Case-contol Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of person-years experienced by the cohort was calculated in 5-year intervals of age and calendar time (Coleman et al, 1986 …”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical significance of any excess of second tumours was derived by assuming the observed number to be drawn from a Poisson distribution with mean equal to the expected number: tests were onesided, in the direction of the observed difference. These calculations were done separately for index tumours diagnosed in the 1960s and the 1970s, using the program PYRS (Coleman et al, 1986). Ninety per cent confidence intervals for the RR were calculated (Rothman & Boice, 1982 (Table I).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%