Cohort Profile: The Zurich Project on the Social Development From Childhood to Adulthood (Z-Proso)

Ribeaud, Denis; Al, Murray; Shanahan, Lilly; Shanahan, Meghan; Eisner, Michal

doi:10.31234/osf.io/pt53v

Cited by 14 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 35 publications

(50 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Full details regarding z‐proso, including the recruitment, assessments, and demographic characteristics, are reported elsewhere (e.g. Eisner et al., 2019; Ribeaud, Murray, Shanahan, Shanahan, & Eisner, 2021), and further information can be found via the study website (http://www.jacobscenter.uzh.ch/en/research/zproso/aboutus.html). Z‐proso data have been used previously to examine the links between stressful life events and self‐injury.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Missing data were handled with full information maximum likelihood estimation, which provides optimal parameter estimates when data are missing at random. Full details regarding z-proso, including the recruitment, assessments, and demographic characteristics, are reported elsewhere (e.g., Eisner et al, 2019;Ribeaud et al, 2021), and further information can be found via the study website (http://www.jacobscenter.uzh.ch/en/research/zproso/aboutus.html). Z-proso data have been used previously to examine the links between stressful life events and self-injury.…”

Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Developmental associations between bullying victimization and suicidal ideation and direct self‐injurious behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood

Zhu

Griffiths

Eisner

et al. 2021

Child Psychology Psychiatry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Bullying, suicide, and self-injury are significant issues among young people. Extensive research has documented bullying victimization associations with suicidal ideation and self-injury; however, the modeling approaches used have mostly not addressed the relations between these constructs at the within-person level, and it is these links that are critical for testing developmental theories and guiding intervention efforts. This examined the within-person, bidirectional relations between these constructs in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Methods: Participants were from the Zurich Project on Social Development from Childhood to Adulthood (z-proso). Random intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPMs) were fit to general and sexual bullying victimization and suicidal ideation data at ages 15, 17, and 20 (n = 1465), and general and sexual victimization and direct self-injurious behavior data at ages 13, 15, 17, and 20 (n = 1482). Results: There was a positive within-person effect of age 15 general bullying victimization on age 17 suicidal ideation ( = .10) and age 17 suicidal ideation on age 20 general bullying victimization ( = .14). Conclusions: General bullying victimization and suicidal ideation may have detrimental effects on each other over development but at different stages.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developmental associations between bullying victimization and suicidal ideation and direct self‐injurious behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood

Zhu

Griffiths

Eisner

et al. 2021

Child Psychology Psychiatry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The data came from the longitudinal Zurich Project on the Social Development from Childhood to Adulthood (z-proso; Ribeaud and Eisner, 2010;Eisner et al, 2019;Ribeaud et al, 2021). Participants were selected using a cluster-stratified randomized sampling approach.…”

Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The first aim of our study was to examine the prevalence and stability of polysubstance use (defined here as the use of at least two psychoactive substances during the previous year) between early adolescence and early adulthood. We leveraged data from a representative, urban community sample (Ribeaud and Eisner, 2010;Shanahan et al, 2020;Ribeaud et al, 2021) with prospective longitudinal assessments from childhood to early adulthood, and substance use assessments beginning in early adolescence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Polysubstance Use in Early Adulthood: Patterns and Developmental Precursors in an Urban Cohort

Steinhoff

Bechtiger

Ribeaud

et al. 2022

Front. Behav. Neurosci.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Polysubstance use (i.e., simultaneous or sequential use of different psychoactive substances) is associated with increases in the risk of severe health problems and social impairments. The present study leverages community-representative, long-term longitudinal data from an urban cohort to assess: (a) the prevalence and continuation of polysubstance use between adolescence and early adulthood; (b) different patterns of polysubstance use (i.e., combinations of substances) in early adulthood; and (c) childhood risk factors for polysubstance use in early adulthood. At age 20 (n = 1,180), respondents provided comprehensive self-reported information on past-year substance use, including use of legal and illicit substances (e.g., cannabinoids, stimulants, and hallucinogens), and nonmedical use of prescription drugs (e.g., opioids, tranquilizers). In adolescence (ages 13–17), limited versions of this questionnaire were administered. In childhood (ages 7–11), potential risk factors, including individual-level factors (e.g., sensation-seeking, low self-control, aggression, and internalizing symptoms) and social-environmental factors (e.g., social stressors, exposure to others’ substance use), were assessed. We fitted latent class models to identify classes of participants with different substance use profiles in early adulthood. The results show that polysubstance use increased between early adolescence and early adulthood. The continuation of polysubstance use was common (stability between all adjacent assessments: odds ratio >7). At age 20, more than one-third of participants reported polysubstance use (involving illicit substances, nonmedical use of prescription drugs, and cannabidiol). Four latent classes with polysubstance use were identified: (1) broad spectrum of substances; (2) cannabis and club drugs; (3) cannabis and the nonmedical use of prescription drugs; and (4) different cannabinoids. Risk factors for any polysubstance use included childhood sensation-seeking and exposure to others’ substance use; some childhood risk factors were differentially associated with the four classes (e.g., low self-control in childhood was associated with an increased likelihood of being in the broad spectrum class). The classes also differed with regard to socio-demographic factors. This study revealed that polysubstance use is a widespread and multifaceted phenomenon that typically emerges during adolescence. To facilitate the design of tailored prevention mechanisms, the heterogeneity of polysubstance use and respective socio-demographic and developmental precursors need to be considered.

show abstract

“…The most important difference was that children whose parents did not speak German as a first language were underrepresented in the study sample. Thus, the children at baseline could be considered broadly representative of the underlying population of same-aged children in (Eisner et al, 2019) and via the z-proso website: https://www.jacobscenter.uzh .ch/en/research/zproso.html and in the cohort profile (Ribeaud et al, 2021).…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender differences in cross-informant discrepancies in aggressive and prosocial behavior: A latent difference score analysis.

Murray¹,

Nivette²,

Mirman³

et al. 2022

Psychological Assessment

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cross-informant discrepancies (CIDs) in youth behavior are common. Given that these same behaviors often show or are perceived to show gender differences, it is important to understand how informant perceptions and their discrepancies are affected by gender. In n = 1,048 (51% male) Grade 5 (age 11) Swiss youth, self-versus teacher (n = 261) CIDs were explored using latent difference score (LDS) modeling. CIDs in prosociality (β = −.15) and aggression (β = .14) were predicted by child gender after adjusting for a range of covariates. Males reported more aggression than was attributed to them by teachers whereas females reported less aggression than was attributed to them. Both genders reported more prosociality than was attributed to them, with a larger discrepancy for males. Accounting for gender-related informant differences could help improve assessments used to ascertain whether clinically significant problems are present. Public Significance StatementWhen assessing child social and behavior problems, gathering information from multiple sources (e.g., both teachers and youth themselves) is recommended; however, these sources often disagree. We found that gender impacts the disagreements between youth and their teachers on youth aggressive and prosocial behavior in a systematic way. This information helps improve the interpretation of scores from these two sources.

show abstract

Cohort Profile: The Zurich Project on the Social Development From Childhood to Adulthood (Z-Proso)

Cited by 14 publications

References 35 publications

Developmental associations between bullying victimization and suicidal ideation and direct self‐injurious behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood

Developmental associations between bullying victimization and suicidal ideation and direct self‐injurious behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood

Polysubstance Use in Early Adulthood: Patterns and Developmental Precursors in an Urban Cohort

Gender differences in cross-informant discrepancies in aggressive and prosocial behavior: A latent difference score analysis.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About