2018
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohort Profile: The Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
213
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
213
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study was a cross-sectional analysis of data from the WIHS, a prospective cohort study of HIV-seropositive women and demographically similar HIV-seronegative women in the USA. Cohort recruitment, demographics and retention are described elsewhere (Barkan et al, 1998;Bacon et al, 2005;Hessol et al, 2009;Adimora et al, 2018). WIHS participants undergo structured interviews and physical examinations every 6 months at nine sites across the USA and have blood and other biological samples taken.…”
Section: Study Design and Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study was a cross-sectional analysis of data from the WIHS, a prospective cohort study of HIV-seropositive women and demographically similar HIV-seronegative women in the USA. Cohort recruitment, demographics and retention are described elsewhere (Barkan et al, 1998;Bacon et al, 2005;Hessol et al, 2009;Adimora et al, 2018). WIHS participants undergo structured interviews and physical examinations every 6 months at nine sites across the USA and have blood and other biological samples taken.…”
Section: Study Design and Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This investigation was part of the WIHS, the ongoing US multicenter prospective cohort investigation of HIV infection and related health conditions among HIV seropositive women and demographically similar seronegative comparison women. The protocols, recruitment processes, procedures, and baseline results of the WIHS have been described [10][11][12]. Enrollment began prior to the widespread introduction of cART with 2623 women (2056 with HIV and 569 without) in 1994-1995 at six study consortia (Bronx, Brooklyn, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington, DC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women were enrolled based on having a known HIV‐seropositive (prior diagnosis) or HIV‐seronegative status with a history of sexually transmitted infections (STIS) or demographic and behavioural characteristics that increased their susceptibility to HIV acquisition. Details of the study population and recruitment strategies have been previously described [19‐21]. Participants were not deliberately matched on any characteristics prior to enrolment into the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were interviewed and examined semiannually using structured questionnaires administered by trained research staff, and laboratory testing was conducted to assess HIV‐related outcomes [19‐21]. This analysis included all 3626 WLWH who self‐reported on country of birth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation