2016
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohort Profile: The VicGeneration (VicGen) study: An Australian oral health birth cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table shows the characteristics of those children included in the analysis. Reasons for non‐participation across time‐points included participants moving from the area, loss to follow‐up, electing to miss a time‐point, and withdrawal due to time constraints …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table shows the characteristics of those children included in the analysis. Reasons for non‐participation across time‐points included participants moving from the area, loss to follow‐up, electing to miss a time‐point, and withdrawal due to time constraints …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LGA's were purposely selected to provide a higher level of disadvantage and cultural diversity and were in a mix of metropolitan, regional, and rural areas. This study was approved by the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 0722543), and its protocol and cohort profile have been published …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A PubMed search using the terms “cohort profile” and “children” identified 116 publications that contained this type of information. Table 2 provides a summary of the six cohort profiles published in 2016 [3742]. While inclusion in such a repository would require further investigation of many of the issues discussed above, including data-sharing permissions and investigator interest, we encourage pediatric societies and individual researchers to begin to think about how shared resources can be created to serve the larger pediatric research community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%