2019
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohort Profile: The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
630
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 557 publications
(633 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
2
630
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Initially a school-based study, the sample is representative of adolescents attending U.S. public, private, and parochial schools in grades seven to twelve in the 1994–1995 school year, with over-sampled groups (e.g., non-Hispanic blacks with a college-educated parent). The Wave I in-home participant and parental interview was conducted in 1994–1995 (aged 11–21 years, N=20,745; Appendix Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Initially a school-based study, the sample is representative of adolescents attending U.S. public, private, and parochial schools in grades seven to twelve in the 1994–1995 school year, with over-sampled groups (e.g., non-Hispanic blacks with a college-educated parent). The Wave I in-home participant and parental interview was conducted in 1994–1995 (aged 11–21 years, N=20,745; Appendix Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Add Health is a probability-based, nationally representative survey of 20,745 US adolescents enrolled in grades 7 through 12 in the 1994–1995 school year (Wave I). (See Harris et al, 2009 for more detail [27]. ) Add Health procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects at the University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-response bias for Wave IV is negligible, and the Wave IV sample adequately represents the Wave I population. Subjects provided written informed consent in accordance with the University of North Carolina Institutional Review Board guidelines (20). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%