2017
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx227
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohort Profile: The Hoorn Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We harmonized data from the Hoorn Study (HS) (n = 2484) and The New Hoorn Study (NHS) (n = 2807) cohorts. Both cohorts were similar in design, population characteristics, and questionnaires, and are described in detail elsewhere [12]. In short, participants from the general population were recruited between 1989 and 1992 for the HS and between 2006 and 2007 for the NHS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We harmonized data from the Hoorn Study (HS) (n = 2484) and The New Hoorn Study (NHS) (n = 2807) cohorts. Both cohorts were similar in design, population characteristics, and questionnaires, and are described in detail elsewhere [12]. In short, participants from the general population were recruited between 1989 and 1992 for the HS and between 2006 and 2007 for the NHS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hoorn and Cohort on Diabetes and Atherosclerosis Maastricht (CODAM) studies are observational, prospective cohort studies on determinants and (cardiovascular) complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The original Hoorn study was executed in 2484 randomly selected residents of Hoorn between 1989 and 1992 . Between 2000 and 2001, follow‐up measurements were conducted in a subset (n = 822) of participants, which were used for the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original Hoorn study was executed in 2484 randomly selected residents of Hoorn between 1989 and 1992 . Between 2000 and 2001, follow‐up measurements were conducted in a subset (n = 822) of participants, which were used for the current study. The CODAM study was performed in 574 participants of the Dutch Monitoring Project for Cardiovascular Diseases (MORGEN) and its predecessor with an elevated risk of T2DM .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recruitment, enrolment and eligibility: The derivations of Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 are shown in Figure 1. The sampling-frame for Cohort 1 was derived from four existing prospective cohort studies: Metabolic Syndrome in Men (METSIM) study (Finland) [8]; Relationship between Insulin Sensitivity and Cardiovascular disease (RISC) [9], Hoorn Meal Study (HMS), and New Hoorn Study (NHS) [10] (Netherlands); Health2010 [11], Health2006 [12], Danish Study of Functional Disorders (DanFunD) [13], and Gut, Grain and Greens (GGG) [14] studies (Denmark); Malmö Diet and Cancer (MDC) study (Sweden) [15]. Participants for Cohort 2 were identified through general practice and other registries, as described previously [7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%