2014
DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.12108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohort profile: Risk evaluation of cancers in Chinese diabetic individuals: a longitudinal (REACTION) study (队列简介:中国糖尿病患者肿瘤发生风险的纵向研究(REACTION研究))

Abstract: The multi-center REACTION study has captured a broad range of data on physical, psychological and metabolic function as well as health status, biochemical and lifestyle information in 259 657 adults from the general population across the China.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
129
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

7
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
129
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodology of REACTION study has been described previously 14, 15, 16. Eligible study participants were identified from the local residence registration records and must be age 40 years or older.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology of REACTION study has been described previously 14, 15, 16. Eligible study participants were identified from the local residence registration records and must be age 40 years or older.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was one part of the baseline survey from the REACTION study, which was a multicenter, prospective cohort study; its primary objective was to demonstrate whether abnormal glucose metabolism was associated with increased risk of cancer in a Chinese population [5, 6]. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] During February and March 2012, we investigated 10,028 subjects (6,458 women) 40-90 years of age from four urban communities (one from Jinan city and three from Jining city) in Shandong Province, China. The average response rate was 91.5%.…”
Section: Study Design and Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%