2017
DOI: 10.2147/clep.s129335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohort description: The Danish study of Functional Disorders

Abstract: The Danish study of Functional Disorders (DanFunD) cohort was initiated to outline the epidemiology of functional somatic syndromes (FSS) and is the first larger coordinated epidemiological study focusing exclusively on FSS. FSS are prevalent in all medical settings and can be defined as syndromes that, after appropriate medical assessment, cannot be explained in terms of a conventional medical or surgical disease. FSS are frequent and the clinical importance varies from vague symptoms to extreme disability. N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

7
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study was designed as a cross-sectional two-phase study (Fig. 2) using data from the Danish Study of Functional Disorders (DanFunD) part two cohort 77 . In brief, the cohort was established from 2012 to 2015 with the purpose of investigating FSD in the general Danish population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was designed as a cross-sectional two-phase study (Fig. 2) using data from the Danish Study of Functional Disorders (DanFunD) part two cohort 77 . In brief, the cohort was established from 2012 to 2015 with the purpose of investigating FSD in the general Danish population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These comprise the Danish study of functional disorders (DanFunD) [16], Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (MDCS) [17], Genesis/Genediab [18], Innovative Medicines Initiative – Surrogate markers for Micro- and Macro-vascular hard endpoints for Innovative diabetes Tools (IMI-SUMMIT) Consortia (Europe/UK-based consortia on diabetes studies) [19] and Greenlandic Inuit populations ( n  = 2605) [20]. The DanFunD, MDCS and Greenlandic studies were population based, whereas the Genesis/Genediab studies involved people with type 1 diabetes and the IMI-SUMMIT comprised four type 1 and five type 2 diabetes studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, patients in the clinician-referred group underwent the interview face-to-face, whereas patients in the self-referred group underwent the interview via video conferencing. The video-based SCAN interview was modified and shortened based on a procedure from a large Danish epidemiology study 21 (1-2 h) compared with the longer face-to-face interview (3-4 h). This modification pertained primarily to the length of history taking and amount of psychoeducation provided at the time of the interview.…”
Section: Referral and Assessment Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%