DOI: 10.2969/aspm/02710185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohomology rings and nilpotent quotients of real and complex arrangements

Abstract: For an arrangement with complement X and fundamental group G, we relate the truncated cohomology ring, H ≤2 (X), to the second nilpotent quotient, G/G 3 . We define invariants of G/G 3 by counting normal subgroups of a fixed prime index p, according to their abelianization. We show how to compute this distribution from the resonance varieties of the Orlik-Solomon algebra mod p. As an application, we establish the cohomology classification of 2-arrangements of n ≤ 6 planes in R 4 . 2.For q = 1, questions (I) an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
88
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These varieties are homotopy-type invariants of M (A), which inform on the homology of certain abelian covers [9,16], and also on the structure of the second nilpotent quotient of the fundamental group [13]. It follows from work of Arapura [2] that the characteristic varieties, or cohomology support loci, are unions of torsion-translated subtori of (C * ) n in more general circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These varieties are homotopy-type invariants of M (A), which inform on the homology of certain abelian covers [9,16], and also on the structure of the second nilpotent quotient of the fundamental group [13]. It follows from work of Arapura [2] that the characteristic varieties, or cohomology support loci, are unions of torsion-translated subtori of (C * ) n in more general circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partitions need not correspond to multinets, and the corresponding varieties need not be linear or disjoint, as our Examples 4.4 and 4.3 show. Example 4.2, due to D. Matei and A. Suciu [26], shows that the stratification of R(A, k) need not coincide with stratification by dimension.…”
Section: Resonance and Characteristic Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the characteristic zero assumption is necessary; the aforementioned results depend on this. A thorough treatment of resonance varieties over arbitrary fields (and even commutative rings) can be found in a recent paper of Falk [17] (see also [24]). …”
Section: Resonance Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix ∆ lin appears in the statement of Theorem 4.6 and in Remark 4.7 from [8]; see also [24] and [28] for more general contexts. The reason for the terminology is as follows: Viewing Λ ⊗ C as the coordinate ring of the algebraic torus (C * ) n and S ⊗ C as the coordinate ring of C n , the entries of ∆ lin are the derivatives at 1 ∈ (C * ) n of the corresponding entries of ∆.…”
Section: Linearized Alexander Invariantmentioning
confidence: 99%