2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00031-011-9149-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohomology of Spaltenstein varieties

Abstract: We give a presentation for the cohomology algebra of the Spaltenstein variety of all partial flags annihilated by a fixed nilpotent matrix, generalizing the description of the cohomology algebra of the Springer fiber found by De Concini, Procesi and Tanisaki.Comment: 28 page

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case G = GL n , every orbit O is equivariantly simply-connected and there is a natural G-equivariant semi-small resolution of singularities of O whose fibres admit affine pavings [BO11]. It follows that there exists a perverse parity sheaf E(O) with support O for any k as above.…”
Section: Toric Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case G = GL n , every orbit O is equivariantly simply-connected and there is a natural G-equivariant semi-small resolution of singularities of O whose fibres admit affine pavings [BO11]. It follows that there exists a perverse parity sheaf E(O) with support O for any k as above.…”
Section: Toric Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this description together with Theorem 8.1, a proof of Conjecture 8.10 for g = sl n appears in [Wee, Theorem 8.3.7]. It is also possible to prove this result by showing explicitly that the B-algebra agrees in this case with the (straightforward) equivariant generalization of the Brundan-Ostrik presentation [BO11] of the cohomology of S3 varieties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this action, the Chevalley generators of g act as certain trace maps associated to canonical adjunction maps between special translation functors that arise from tensoring with a g-module and its dual. In [15] it is explained that this action is closely connected to Ginzburg's geometric construction of representations of the general linear group [25]. Theorem 1.3 provides a context for understanding this surprising action by traces on category O.…”
Section: Quantum Group Categorificationsmentioning
confidence: 93%