2009
DOI: 10.1515/crelle.2009.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohomological finiteness conditions for elementary amenable groups

Abstract: It is proved that every elementary amenable group of type FP ∞ admits a cocompact classifying space for proper actions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A version of this fact was conjectured by Gildenhuys and Strebel [10] and proved by the first author [16]. Subsequently this led to a proof that elementary amenable groups of type FP ∞ over Z are constructible [17] and to the construction of classifying spaces for proper actions for such groups, see [16,19,20]. (Results in [17,20] also apply considerably beyond the elementary amenable case.…”
Section: Background Materials and Historical Remarksmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A version of this fact was conjectured by Gildenhuys and Strebel [10] and proved by the first author [16]. Subsequently this led to a proof that elementary amenable groups of type FP ∞ over Z are constructible [17] and to the construction of classifying spaces for proper actions for such groups, see [16,19,20]. (Results in [17,20] also apply considerably beyond the elementary amenable case.…”
Section: Background Materials and Historical Remarksmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…where D * is obtained by applying the induction functor associated to M F A 5 → M F Γ to (21) and is therefore of the form…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This invariant is bounded from below by the virtual cohomological dimension vcd(G) of G, which is the cohomological dimension of any finite index torsion-free subgroup of G, and in many interesting cases these two quantities are in fact equal (e.g. see [15,9,1,19,27,2]). On the other hand, there are by now a number of examples showing that gd(G) can be strictly larger than vcd(G) (see [17,22,10,16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%