2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11854-020-0136-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohomological equation and cocycle rigidity of discrete parabolic actions in some higher-rank Lie groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimates of the solution in above theorem are not tame, i.e., there is no finite loss of regularity (with respect to Sobolev norms) between the coboundary and the solution. Similar results were proven for the (discrete) classical horocycle map, see [9], [38] and [39]. The next result shows that when G = SL(n, R), n ≥ 3, they are indeed the best possible up to a finite loss of regularity.…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The estimates of the solution in above theorem are not tame, i.e., there is no finite loss of regularity (with respect to Sobolev norms) between the coboundary and the solution. Similar results were proven for the (discrete) classical horocycle map, see [9], [38] and [39]. The next result shows that when G = SL(n, R), n ≥ 3, they are indeed the best possible up to a finite loss of regularity.…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Theorem 2.2 proves that in the case of SL(n, R), for n ≥ 3, these Sobolev estimates are, in fact, generally not tame, and our Sobolev estimates in Theorem 2.1 are sharp up to finite loss of regularity. Theorem 2.2 gives the same lower bound for SL(2, R), which is part of the proof of analogous sharp (up to finite loss of regularity), non-tame estimates for horocycle maps, to appear in the forthcoming paper [39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations