Cohesive Growth in Europe: A Tale of Two Peripheries

Dauderstädt, Michael

doi:10.1007/s10272-021-0964-y

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is also important for our research to mention the world crisis of 2008/2009, which affected each of the observed countries differently. Countries that implement their structural reforms faster and more efficiently see greater benefits (Dauderstädt, 2021;Župerkienė et al, 2021). For this reason, peripheral countries benefit less from European integration, while the so-called core countries, i.e.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In his work, Dauderstädt (2021) points out that the economic benefits of the single market are obvious for all countries, but these benefits differ greatly between countries. Economic growth is dependent on the quantity and quality of attracted investments and accumulated knowledge, from which countries that later join the processes of European integration benefit the least.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Measuring the Effect of Entry Into the Eurozone on Economic Growth – Data Storytelling Using Clustering and Anfis

Bosna,

Brlečić Valčić,

Peša

2024

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this paper is to examine the impact of a country’s entry into the monetary union on its economic variables growth rate of real GDP as well as on GDP per capita growth for the period from 2010 to 2020. The clustering method and the ANFIS method were used in the data analysis. A total of two cluster analyses were performed. The first cluster includes countries that joined the EU in 2004 and became EZ members by 2010. The second cluster refers to those countries that joined the EU in 2004 but are not yet members of the EZ. For the first individual cluster analysis two models were analysed and for the second individual cluster three models were analysed using the ANFIS method. As expected, the results showed that GDP growth is connected with trade, inflation and gross investments in fixed capital in the observed countries, while GDP per capita is connected with unemployment, interest rates and public debt. With regard to GDP growth, the difference between countries that are in the eurozone and those that are not is not significant, which is in line with other studies.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring the Effect of Entry Into the Eurozone on Economic Growth – Data Storytelling Using Clustering and Anfis

Bosna,

Brlečić Valčić,

Peša

2024

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The EU's southern periphery (Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain) suffered most, thus aggravating already existing problems resulting from the Great Recession of 2009, the subsequent sovereign debt panic and the ill-designed austerity policies (Gräbner et al, 2020). The pandemic reinforced the previous regional pattern of catch-up growth in the EU (Dauderstädt, 2021b).…”

Section: The Heterogeneous Economic Impact Of the Pandemic Across Eu ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

International Inequality and the COVID-19 Pandemic

Dauderstädt¹

2022

Intereconomics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The lockdowns and stimulus programmes that governments have adopted to fight the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated economic crisis have affected the distribution of income and production within and between countries. Considering both, current evidence indicates that the EU-wide and global inequality of disposable income did not change dramatically in 2020. However, the unequal impact on the wealth and health of people is likely to worsen income inequality in the future.

show abstract

“…In further research on the development of tools for measuring the state of development of transport infrastructure and production in a territory, it is necessary to pay attention to the internal regions of countries to identify the direction and nature of the relationship between the developed transport infrastructure and developed production in a territory at the mezzo-level. This is easier to implement in relation to output than transport infrastructure since tools for measuring the state of development of production in a territory, the industrial output and the GDP per capita are usually available for the countries' internal regions (Boronenko et al, 2014;Dauderstädt, 2021). Another important aspect for future research is that transport infrastructure must be viewed both as a whole and by the types of transport.…”

Section: Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of transport infrastructure and its impact on territorial production

Komarova¹,

Čižo²,

Balodis³

et al. 2023

JESI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this article is the conceptualization and empirical interpretation of the notions of a developed transport infrastructure and developed production, as well as the identification of tools for their measurement in a territory. The main research questions to which the authors intend to find answers in this article are the following: (1) what does it mean (conceptually and empirically) 'developed transport infrastructure' and 'developed production' in a given territory? (2) how to measure the state of development (i.e., the static level of development) of transport infrastructure and production in a given territory? The article uses the following research methods: a systemic analysis of theoretical findings and empirical evidence from previous studies, a method of means for identifying developed / underdeveloped transport infrastructure/production, and a mapping method to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the country's transport infrastructure. The results of this study show that, firstly, there are two main approaches to the conceptual understanding of transport infrastructure and productiontraditional (narrower) and innovative (wider); secondly, developed transport infrastructure and developed products in the EU country are interpreted empirically with scores above the EU average, thirdly, almost all EU countries demonstrate a developed or undeveloped transport infrastructure and production, regardless of their measurement tools, i.e. different measurement tools show nearly the same result. The results of this study will help the authors in the future, based on quantitative empirical data and case studies, to answer the 'umbrella' research question about what is a priority for the economic development of the territory: a developed transport infrastructure or a developed production, i.e. what is the focus for investments in the conditions of objectively limited resources?

show abstract

Cohesive Growth in Europe: A Tale of Two Peripheries

Cited by 4 publications

References 6 publications

Measuring the Effect of Entry Into the Eurozone on Economic Growth – Data Storytelling Using Clustering and Anfis

Measuring the Effect of Entry Into the Eurozone on Economic Growth – Data Storytelling Using Clustering and Anfis

International Inequality and the COVID-19 Pandemic

Development of transport infrastructure and its impact on territorial production

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About