The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohesive crack propagation analysis using a dipole BEM formulation with tangent operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dimensionless load and deflection values have been utilised for this purpose. The dimensionless load relates the reaction forces 𝑃𝑃 1 and 𝑃𝑃 2 at the supports to the prescribed displacement to geometrical and material parameters as follows:   (28) in which 𝑓𝑓 𝑇𝑇 is the tensile material strength and 𝑑𝑑 and 𝑡𝑡 are, respectively, the specimen's height and the thickness. Besides, the dimensionless displacement corresponds to the division between 6.10 4 times the applied displacement and the specimen's height.…”
Section: Four-point Bending Problem Multiple Cohesive Crack Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dimensionless load and deflection values have been utilised for this purpose. The dimensionless load relates the reaction forces 𝑃𝑃 1 and 𝑃𝑃 2 at the supports to the prescribed displacement to geometrical and material parameters as follows:   (28) in which 𝑓𝑓 𝑇𝑇 is the tensile material strength and 𝑑𝑑 and 𝑡𝑡 are, respectively, the specimen's height and the thickness. Besides, the dimensionless displacement corresponds to the division between 6.10 4 times the applied displacement and the specimen's height.…”
Section: Four-point Bending Problem Multiple Cohesive Crack Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BEM does not require domain mesh, which enables accurate assessment of internal mechanical fields and non-complex remeshing procedures during the crack growth. Several BEM formulations have been proposed in the literature for the solution of fracture problems, such as single-domain technique [26], multi-domain technique [27], dipoles approach [28] and cells with embedded discontinuities [29], for instance. Nevertheless, the robust BEM approach in fracture mechanics is the dual BEM (DBEM) formulation [24], [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study extends the dipole-based approach, 55,56 to the three dimensional context, which is the novelty herein. The original contribution involves the integral kernels associated to degeneration of the stress field along the FPZ surface and its mechanical influence into the internal and boundary mechanical fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The formulation described in reference 55 demonstrates excellent accuracy in the mechanical modelling of fracture processes in quasi‐brittle materials. Recently, Almeida et al 56 presented further developments in this formulation, in which comprehensive cohesive crack propagation analyses with tangent operator scheme have been introduced. In spite of its accuracy and effectivity, the dipole‐based BEM formulation has been limited to two‐dimensional domain, until the present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%