2020
DOI: 10.14311/cej.2020.03.0032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohesion Test of a Single Impregnated Ar-Glass Roving in High-Performance Concrete

Abstract: The development of light and very thin concrete building structures and demand for extremely thin elements in design are inter alia reasons for the development of composite materials as non-traditional reinforcement. Composite materials are currently used as reinforcement mostly in the form of fiber reinforced polymer bars similar to traditional steel reinforcement bars, but the last decade sees also rise in the use of technical textiles. This article is focused on the interaction between impregnated textile r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident from the mechanical test results ( Figure 14 ) that the B series samples showed a similar trend of bending capacity increase, mainly in the initial phases of crack development, as has been shown in reference samples Epoxy 1. However, due to an alternative material used in this study, the results of this solution deviate from that of conventional TRC with an epoxy resin matrix [ 44 , 45 , 46 ] and a comparison of results is therefore problematic. The best-aperforming combinations (sample series A and B) will be further investigated by mechanical tests focusing on a detailed description of cement matrix behavior, for example the so-called pullout test based on simple co-interaction of one cement-saturated carbon roving with concrete.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident from the mechanical test results ( Figure 14 ) that the B series samples showed a similar trend of bending capacity increase, mainly in the initial phases of crack development, as has been shown in reference samples Epoxy 1. However, due to an alternative material used in this study, the results of this solution deviate from that of conventional TRC with an epoxy resin matrix [ 44 , 45 , 46 ] and a comparison of results is therefore problematic. The best-aperforming combinations (sample series A and B) will be further investigated by mechanical tests focusing on a detailed description of cement matrix behavior, for example the so-called pullout test based on simple co-interaction of one cement-saturated carbon roving with concrete.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments regarding the carbon textile impregnated with epoxy resin were performed in two variants to evaluate the effects on cohesion. The first variant was with the smooth untreated surface of the impregnated rovings, while the second was with surface treatment using a fine-grained silica sand [ 17 , 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensile strength of carbon reinforcement was tested using LabTest 4.100SP1 testing machine with a constant increment of displacement of 1.2 mm/min on rovings impregnated with epoxy resin. Impregnation of rovings ensured proper interaction of all fibers [ 17 ]. The ultimate tensile strength was dependent on the quality of resin impregnation, as improperly coated fibers broke prematurely, and the tensile strength decreased.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations