2005
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0504805102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohesins are required for meiotic DNA breakage and recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Abstract: In preparation for the unique segregation of homologs at the first meiotic division, chromosomes undergo dramatic changes. The meiosis-specific sister chromatid cohesins Rec8 and Rec11 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe are recruited around the time of premeiotic replication, and Rec10, a component of meiosis-specific linear elements, is subsequently added. Here we report that Rec10 is essential for meiosis-specific DNA breakage by Rec12 (Spo11 homolog) and for meiotic recombination. DNA breakage and recombination a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
160
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
12
160
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that Rec10 plays a role in regulating both crossing over and gene conversion throughout the genome and not only in restricted regions, as previously reported. This finding corroborates a similar finding made recently by Ellermeier and Smith (2005), who employed a rec10D mutant. Moreover, there is a differential requirement for a function of Rec10 for controlling gene conversions; this function is lost in the rec10-155 mutant (see discussion).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These results indicate that Rec10 plays a role in regulating both crossing over and gene conversion throughout the genome and not only in restricted regions, as previously reported. This finding corroborates a similar finding made recently by Ellermeier and Smith (2005), who employed a rec10D mutant. Moreover, there is a differential requirement for a function of Rec10 for controlling gene conversions; this function is lost in the rec10-155 mutant (see discussion).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This includes loci at which we observed only relatively minor reductions. For example, the rec10-155 mutation results in a 2-fold reduction in intergenic recombination at the ura1-pro1 interval on chromosome I, while the rec10-175 null mutation gives a 42-fold reduction at this interval (Ellermeier and Smith 2005). We confirmed the differences between rec10-155 and rec10-175 by measuring pro1-ura1 intergenic recombination and ura1 intragenic recombination for both mutants under identical conditions (Table 2; data not shown).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The potential Rec114 ortholog in S. pombe, Rec7, also localizes to chromosomes, but Rec7 foci appear closely associated with chromosome axes and these foci do not form in mutants defective for the axis-associated protein Rec10 (Lorenz et al 2006). These differences may reflect the closer functional dependency between DSB formation and the cohesin-containing axes in S. pombe (Ellermeier and Smith 2005;Loidl 2006;Lorenz et al 2006;Wells et al 2006). …”
Section: Association Of Mei4 and Rec114 With Chromosomesmentioning
confidence: 99%