2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1505323112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohesin recruits the Esco1 acetyltransferase genome wide to repress transcription and promote cohesion in somatic cells

Abstract: The cohesin complex links DNA molecules and plays key roles in the organization, expression, repair, and segregation of eukaryotic genomes. In vertebrates the Esco1 and Esco2 acetyltransferases both modify cohesin's Smc3 subunit to establish sister chromatid cohesion during S phase, but differ in their N-terminal domains and expression during development and across the cell cycle. Here we show that Esco1 and Esco2 also differ dramatically in their interaction with chromatin, as Esco1 is recruited by cohesin to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
43
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Smc3 acetylation can occur at low levels outside S phase and is regulated by the ATPase activity of cohesin (40,41). Although binding of Pds5 to cohesin does not require Smc3 acetylation in human cells, the Pds5-dependent binding of sororin to cohesin requires Smc3 acetylation (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smc3 acetylation can occur at low levels outside S phase and is regulated by the ATPase activity of cohesin (40,41). Although binding of Pds5 to cohesin does not require Smc3 acetylation in human cells, the Pds5-dependent binding of sororin to cohesin requires Smc3 acetylation (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, budding and fission yeast have only one cohesin acetyltransferase, whereas vertebrate cells have two: ESCO1 and ESCO2. The human ESCO1 and ESCO2 show strikingly distinct patterns of chromatin association in somatic cells, directed by their divergent N-terminal motifs that are not conserved in budding yeast Eco1 (Hou and Zou 2005;Rahman et al 2015). Second, budding yeast is an exception regarding the mechanisms by which cohesin is removed and recycled from the chromosomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In S. cerevisiae, cohesin removal depends entirely on cleavage of Scc1/Rad21 at anaphase by a protein called separase, whereas, in vertebrates, WAPL removes cohesin from chromosome arms during prophase as intact rings, and only a small pool of cohesin at centromeres remains to be cleaved by the protease separase at anaphase (Peters and Nishiyama 2012;Tedeschi et al 2013). Third, cohesin and ESCO1/2 play roles in controlling gene expression (Rahman et al 2015). These mechanisms are potentially different from budding yeast in which other coregulators of the cohesin function in transcription, such as CTCF, are missing (Peters and Nishiyama 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, cohesin acetylation can occur efficiently before and after DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts [91]. In human cells, Esco1 has been shown to constitutively co-localize with and mediate the acetylation of cohesin at CTCF sites throughout the cell cycle [65,92]. This replication-independent cohesin acetylation mediates gene silencing [92].…”
Section: Establishment Of Sister Chromatid Cohesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In human cells, Esco1 has been shown to constitutively co-localize with and mediate the acetylation of cohesin at CTCF sites throughout the cell cycle [65,92]. This replication-independent cohesin acetylation mediates gene silencing [92]. Thus, Smc3 acetylation is necessary but not sufficient for cohesion establishment.…”
Section: Establishment Of Sister Chromatid Cohesionmentioning
confidence: 99%