5 6DNA is replicated in a defined temporal order termed the replication timing (RT) program. RT is 2 7 spatially segregated in the nucleus with early/late replication corresponding to Hi-C A/B 2 8 chromatin compartments, respectively. Early replication is also associated with active histone 2 9 modifications and transcriptional permissiveness. However, the mechanistic interplay between 3 0 RT, chromatin state, and genome compartmentalization is largely unknown. Here we report that 3 1RT is central to epigenome maintenance and compartmentalization in both human embryonic 3 2 stem cells (hESCs) and cancer cell line HCT116. Knockout (KO) of the conserved RT control 3 3 factor RIF1, rather than causing discrete RT switches as previously suspected, lead to 3 4 dramatically increased cell to cell heterogeneity of RT genome wide, despite RIF1's enrichment 3 5 in late replicating chromatin. RIF1 KO hESCs have a nearly random RT program, unlike all prior 3 6 RIF1 KO cells, including HCT116, which show localized alterations. Regions that retain RT, 3 7 which are prevalent in HCT116 but rare in hESCs, consist of large H3K9me3 domains revealing 3 8 two independent mechanisms of RT regulation that are used to different extents in different cell 3 9 types. RIF1 KO results in a striking genome wide downregulation of H3K27ac peaks and 4 0 enrichment of H3K9me3 at large domains that remain late replicating, while H3K27me3 and 4 1H3K4me3 are re-distributed genome wide in a cell type specific manner. These histone 4 2 modification changes coincided with global reorganization of genome compartments, 4 3 transcription changes and a genome wide strengthening of TAD structures. Inducible 4 4 degradation of RIF1 revealed that disruption of RT is upstream of genome compartmentalization 4 5 changes. Our findings demonstrate that disruption of RT leads to widespread epigenetic mis-4 6 regulation, supporting previously speculative models in which the timing of chromatin assembly 4 7 at the replication fork plays a key role in maintaining the global epigenetic state, which in turn 4 8 5 8 chromatin correspond to A-and B-compartments respectively as defined by high throughput 5 9chromatin conformation capture (Hi-C) (2). Despite these close correlations, the mechanistic link 6 0 between RT and the accurate maintenance of chromatin through cell cycles remains elusive.
1Prior work has shown that histones and their modifications are both recycled from parental 6 2 chromatin and added and modified de novo after passage of the replication fork with different 6 3 chromatin states showing differing dynamics of reassembly (3, 4). It has long been 6 4 hypothesized that RT influences chromatin maintenance. Indeed, microinjection of plasmids into 6 5 mammalian nuclei revealed that plasmids replicated in early S phase were decorated with 6 6 acetylated histones, while those replicated later in S phase were devoid of acetylated histones 6 7 (5). However, there is still no direct evidence implicating RT in epigenetic state maintenance, 6 8 largely due to t...