2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0001698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent Turbulent Structures within Open-Channel Lateral Cavities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the fluid velocities within the DEPs are significantly smaller than the ones within the TPs, a detailed understanding of such velocity field requires a multi-scale description. Although Eulerian velocity measurement techniques such as Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) has been used to quantify the fluid velocity inside cavities 52 , unfortunately it is challenging to simultaneously resolve all the scales of such flow-fields in high-resolution using such methods (see Supplementary Fig. 1) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the fluid velocities within the DEPs are significantly smaller than the ones within the TPs, a detailed understanding of such velocity field requires a multi-scale description. Although Eulerian velocity measurement techniques such as Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) has been used to quantify the fluid velocity inside cavities 52 , unfortunately it is challenging to simultaneously resolve all the scales of such flow-fields in high-resolution using such methods (see Supplementary Fig. 1) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the amplitudes measured by the ultrasonic gauge (at U 1 ) are considered suboptimal to estimate the amplitude of the standing waves inside the cavity. Similarly, the surface registrations by the downstream pressure sensor (P d ) are influenced by the fluctuating inflow of vortices entering the cavity after impingement [13], creating a local enhancement of the potential energy but also local surface irregularities. In contrast, the upstream pressure sensor (P u ) seems less affected by the vortex dynamics (i.e., the typical free-surface depressions occurring with vortices) and mean recirculating flow within the cavity, which motivates the use of the upstream pressure registrations to investigate the amplitude of seiching in function of the Froude number in Sec.…”
Section: A Laboratory Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recirculating flow within the cavity exchanges mass and momentum with the main stream through the mixing layer that develops at the interface between the main stream and the cavity [9][10][11]. This mixing layer is characterized by the advection of quasiperiodic, large-scale vortices [10,12,13] that are shed from the upstream corner of the interface. Their impingement [3,14] on the downstream corner of the interface excites local free-surface oscillations and an intermittent inflow toward the cavity [6,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous researchers have studied the 3D flow pattern inside the cavity 2,3,14,15 and the coherent turbulent structures that arise at the interface between the main stream and the cavity. 3,14,[16][17][18][19] Figure 1 gives a schematic overview of the main flow phenomena, detailed below, in and around such a simplified (square) lateral embayment.…”
Section: B State Of the Art: 3d Flow Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%