1977
DOI: 10.2514/3.60743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent Structures in Jet Turbulence and Noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be attributed to the lower growth rate predicted by stability theory for higher Mach numbers, since the differences in the mean velocity profiles are slight (see figure 1) and could not cause such a significant effect. The reduction of the normalized amplitude for higher Mach numbers was also observed by Armstrong, Fuchs & Michalke (1977) and Suzuki & Colonius (2006) in experimental results for the near-field pressure. On the other hand, for the velocity spectra on the jet lipline, shown in figure 19(c), the results for the three Mach numbers collapse.…”
Section: Velocity Dependence Of the Sound Radiation For Each Azimuthasupporting
confidence: 50%
“…This can be attributed to the lower growth rate predicted by stability theory for higher Mach numbers, since the differences in the mean velocity profiles are slight (see figure 1) and could not cause such a significant effect. The reduction of the normalized amplitude for higher Mach numbers was also observed by Armstrong, Fuchs & Michalke (1977) and Suzuki & Colonius (2006) in experimental results for the near-field pressure. On the other hand, for the velocity spectra on the jet lipline, shown in figure 19(c), the results for the three Mach numbers collapse.…”
Section: Velocity Dependence Of the Sound Radiation For Each Azimuthasupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Several important findings were nevertheless made, which are relevant to our present work. Azimuthally coherent wavepackets were found to be most clearly observed in the near pressure field of natural round jets, which is dominated only by a few low-order azimuthal modes (Michalke & Fuchs 1975;Armstrong, Michalke & Fuchs 1977;Fuchs & Michel 1978). Michalke & Fuchs (1975) also demonstrated that the two-point cross-spectral density (CSD) for any azimuthal mode depends only on the constituent of the pressure field for that azimuthal mode, which motivates azimuthally resolved analysis of wavepackets and source mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…But the extension of the conclusions of such studies to their unforced counterparts is not straightforward. In natural jets the signature of azimuthally coherent wavepackets is clearest in the near pressure field, whose energy is concentrated in a few low-order azimuthal modes, in contrast to the velocity field (Michalke & Fuchs 1975;Armstrong, Fuchs & Michalke 1977;Fuchs & Michel 1978). Measurements using line arrays of microphones in the near field reveal a hydrodynamic wave extending several jet diameters downstream of the nozzle exit (Picard & Delville 2000;Tinney & Jordan 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%