1985
DOI: 10.1142/0096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
1,176
1
10

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,425 publications
(1,216 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
1,176
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…F First we remark that an operator (under suitable conditions) is completely determined by its diagonal matrix elements between standard coherent states [23]. This is also true for diagonal matrix elements between the supercoherent states (37).…”
Section: ⋆-Product On S (22)mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…F First we remark that an operator (under suitable conditions) is completely determined by its diagonal matrix elements between standard coherent states [23]. This is also true for diagonal matrix elements between the supercoherent states (37).…”
Section: ⋆-Product On S (22)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The SCS constructed here will be used heavily in the following sections. We start our discussion by introducing the coherent state including the bosonic and fermionic degrees of freedom [11,23]:…”
Section: Coherent Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A main tool is that called the semi-classical Wehrl entropy W , a measure of phasespace localization [1,22] expressed via coherent states |z [2,23]. Coherent states are eigenstates of a general annihilation operatorâ, appropriate for the problem at hand [23][24][25], i.e.,â…”
Section: Husimi Distributions and Their Wehrl Entropiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of operators have been thus transported and have been reported in the literature, see Folland [12] I. Daubechies [8,19], J. Ramanathan and P Topiwala [13], J. R. Klauder and B. S. Skagerstam [3], C. Heil and D. Walnut [10]. It can easily be shown by integration by parts (see Appendix I) that the following relations hold…”
Section: The Bargman Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation has been derived for the representation of fields in terms of Coherent States which have the form g (p,q) (x) = 1 π 1/4 e ipx e −(x−q) 2 /2 . Extensive discussion of application of Coherent States in Quantum Optics have been given by J. R. Klauder and E. C. G. Sudarshan [2] and later J. R. Klauder and B. S. Skagerstam [3], B. Wells [4], R. Cloude [5], A. Perelomov [6], and J. Elliot and P. Dawber [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%