2011
DOI: 10.1068/ic268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent motion detection in illiterate, literate and dyslexic readers in Papua New Guinea

Abstract: Individuals with dyslexia have often been found to have deficits in coherent motion processing, an index of global dorsal stream functioning. In studies involving pre-literate children it has been demonstrated that there could be a relationship between dorsal stream functioning and poor reading ability, lending weight to the claim that dorsal stream deficits may contribute to reading failure. This research looks at coherent motion sensitivity in adult illiterate readers and matched literate and dyslexic reader… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dyslexic readers have significantly higher spatial and temporal threshold to the FD illusion presented at 18 Hz (Gori et al, 2014), 25 Hz (Pammer and Wheatley, 2001), and 50 Hz (Kevan and Pammer, 2008) compared to non-dyslexic readers, indicating that a specific magnocellular oscillatory synchronization deficit may exist as early as the retina. Pre-readers at risk of dyslexia show the same threshold differences to the FD illusion presented at 50 Hz (Kevan and Pammer, 2008) and illiterate, semi-literate, and literate adults are all equally sensitive to the illusion presented at 50 Hz (Flint and Pammer, 2011). This suggests that sensitivity to the FD illusion is not dependant on magnocellular development as a child learns to read and is therefore not a consequence of failing to learn to read (Kevan and Pammer, 2008;Flint and Pammer, 2019).…”
Section: Magno-dorsal Deficit Hypothesis Of Dyslexiamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Dyslexic readers have significantly higher spatial and temporal threshold to the FD illusion presented at 18 Hz (Gori et al, 2014), 25 Hz (Pammer and Wheatley, 2001), and 50 Hz (Kevan and Pammer, 2008) compared to non-dyslexic readers, indicating that a specific magnocellular oscillatory synchronization deficit may exist as early as the retina. Pre-readers at risk of dyslexia show the same threshold differences to the FD illusion presented at 50 Hz (Kevan and Pammer, 2008) and illiterate, semi-literate, and literate adults are all equally sensitive to the illusion presented at 50 Hz (Flint and Pammer, 2011). This suggests that sensitivity to the FD illusion is not dependant on magnocellular development as a child learns to read and is therefore not a consequence of failing to learn to read (Kevan and Pammer, 2008;Flint and Pammer, 2019).…”
Section: Magno-dorsal Deficit Hypothesis Of Dyslexiamentioning
confidence: 82%