2009
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/42/15/154013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent manipulation of a40Ca+spin qubit in a micro ion trap

Abstract: Abstract. We demonstrate the implementation of a spin qubit with a single 40 Ca + ion in a micro ion trap. The qubit is encoded in the Zeeman ground state levels m J = +1/2 and m J = −1/2 of the S 1/2 state of the ion. We show sideband cooling close to the vibrational ground state and demonstrate the initialization and readout of the qubit levels with 99.5% efficiency. We employ a Raman transition close to the S 1/2 -P 1/2 resonance for coherent manipulation of the qubit. We observe single qubit rotations with… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ion used for the experiments is 40 Ca + , where an external magnetic field splits the S 1/2 ground state into two levels, m J = ±1/2, henceforth referred to as |↑ and |↓ . Qubit rotations between these levels are mediated by stimulated Raman transitions [15,16]. Each experimental run is started by i) Doppler cooling and followed by ii) optical pumping, leaving the ion in the |↑ state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ion used for the experiments is 40 Ca + , where an external magnetic field splits the S 1/2 ground state into two levels, m J = ±1/2, henceforth referred to as |↑ and |↓ . Qubit rotations between these levels are mediated by stimulated Raman transitions [15,16]. Each experimental run is started by i) Doppler cooling and followed by ii) optical pumping, leaving the ion in the |↑ state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…v) For determining the motional state, stimulated Raman transitions between |↑ and |↓ are driven by a pair of off-resonant beams propagating at 90 • with respect to each other. The effective wavevector of the beams is aligned along the trap axis, providing a coupling to the axial mode of vibration, characterized by a Lamb-Dicke factor of η ≈ 0.23. vi) Spin read-out is performed by a shelving pulse followed by the detection of state-dependent fluorescence [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. As the method is based on the discrete discrimination of atomic states of a single trapped particle [17,18], it is robust against many systematic error sources which affect other existing methods.The off-resonant laser is characterized by its detuning ∆ from the 4 2 S 1/2 ↔ 4 2 P 1/2 transition, the Rabi frequency Ω and the relative amplitudes q , which characarXiv:1505.02574v3 [quant-ph] 9 Oct 2015 2 terize the circular (q = ±1, denoted '±' henceforth) and π (q = 0) polarization components.The dispersive interaction with the laser field, detuned by a frequency ∆ from resonance, causes ac Stark shifts [19,20] of the energy levels. Specifically, we are interested in the differential ac Stark shift ∆ S between the two Zeeman-sublevels of the electronic ground state |S 1/2 , m S = ±1/2 , denoted henceforth as |↑ and |↓ .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, the ion is illuminated with light near 397 nm, detuned by ∆ from the 4 2 S 1/2 ↔ 4 2 P 1/2 transition to induce both the dispersive and absorptive interactions, which allow for determining ∆ S and R ± . Spin read-out is accomplished by shelving population from the |↑ level to the metastable 3 2 D 5/2 state by means of rapid adiabatic passage (RAP) pulses [18,25]. This allows for discrimination between |↑ and |↓ as the linewidth of the 4 2 S 1/2 ↔ 3 2 D 5/2 quadrupole transition and the bandwidth of the RAP pulses are much smaller than the Zeeman splitting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured output voltage noise at the trap frequency, in the steady state, is as low as 1.0·10 −9 V/ √ Hz. This results in a spectral density of the electric field noise of about 3.6·10 −13 V 2 / Hz m 2 , which in turn yields a heating rate that lower than the actually observed heating rate ofṅ ≈ 0.3 ms −1 [24] by one order of magnitude; it therefore does not significantly contribute to the anomalous heating. Care was take to suppress digital noise, i.e.…”
Section: Controlled Displacement By Fast Voltage Switchingmentioning
confidence: 82%