1981
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.46.1361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent Conversion of Very Light Pseudoscalar Bosons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(5.18) is the rephasing invariant strong CP phase, when a/f P Q is in its ground state minimum of a/f P Q = 0, the strong CP problem is solved. This model and similar low f P Q scale models are ruled out because of laboratory constraints [378,379,380,381,382], but there are viable extended models where f P Q ≫ 246 GeV (the cosmologically favored value of f P Q is around 10 11 GeV). Because these viable axions have suppressed couplings to quarks ∝ 1/f P Q (see Section 6.7), they are called invisible axions.…”
Section: The Strong Cp Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5.18) is the rephasing invariant strong CP phase, when a/f P Q is in its ground state minimum of a/f P Q = 0, the strong CP problem is solved. This model and similar low f P Q scale models are ruled out because of laboratory constraints [378,379,380,381,382], but there are viable extended models where f P Q ≫ 246 GeV (the cosmologically favored value of f P Q is around 10 11 GeV). Because these viable axions have suppressed couplings to quarks ∝ 1/f P Q (see Section 6.7), they are called invisible axions.…”
Section: The Strong Cp Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above facts point to the possibility that quark-gluon degrees of freedom contribute explicitly to multinucleon correlations [11] and forces [12] in nuclei. These correlations [11] and forces are prominently present already in the basic, tightly-bound He nuclei.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data at these higher energies and at low Q 2 , may be expected to be closer to unity because the kinematic variable (x, Q 2 , E) which appears in the ratio of cross sections (as discussed in the next paragraph), is close to unity, thus removing sensitivity [16] toR A (x, Q 2 ). A possible physical reason for the presence of a form factor which vanishes not only as Q 2 → ∞, but also [12] as Q 2 → 0 (this is the unusual aspect in Eq. (2)), lies in a high degree of coherence associated with the system of exchanged sea partons, and nuclear gluons (which are individually, colored quanta).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…See [14] F 3 This behavior is also present in the cross section for the inverse Primakoff effect, which involves production of a photon by an incident pseudoscalar boson in a nuclear Coloumb field. See [15] cross section is…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%