2019
DOI: 10.1002/lpor.201800226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherency‐Broken Bragg Filters: Overcoming On‐Chip Rejection Limitations

Abstract: Selective optical filters with high rejection levels are of fundamental importance for a wide range of advanced photonic circuits. However, the implementation of high-rejection on-chip optical filters is seriously hampered by phase errors arising from fabrication imperfections. Due to coherent interactions, unwanted phase-shifts result in detrimental destructive interferences that distort the filter response, whatever the chosen strategy (resonators, interferometers, Bragg filters, etc.). State-of-the-art high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(75 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, reflections at the interface between the buried waveguide and the exposed sensing waveguide can be reduced by letting the waveguide enter the sensing region at a shallow angle (rather than at a normal angle). Finally, replacing the directional coupler with either a broadband adiabatic coupler or wavelength-selective filters [10,17,18] would improve the flatness of the received Raman signal and could eliminate the 3 dB insertion loss penalty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, reflections at the interface between the buried waveguide and the exposed sensing waveguide can be reduced by letting the waveguide enter the sensing region at a shallow angle (rather than at a normal angle). Finally, replacing the directional coupler with either a broadband adiabatic coupler or wavelength-selective filters [10,17,18] would improve the flatness of the received Raman signal and could eliminate the 3 dB insertion loss penalty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in most cases these solutions require an active control of each element, and none of them showed a narrowband notch response. On the other hand, there have been remarkable achievements in the improvement of the performance of Si Bragg gratings in terms of selectivity, showing bandwidth below 1 nm [8,9,[15][16][17] or rejection, with values exceeding 80 dB [18]. Subwavelength engineering of the grating lattice has shown to be a simple and powerful tool to achieve narrowband notch responses [8,15,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the achievable rejection level in these filters is limited to ∼ 40 dB due to phase errors arising from fabrication imperfections. Concurrently, we have recently shown that noncoherent cascading of multi-modal waveguide Bragg gratings allows ultra-high rejection levels, exceeding 80 dB [18]. The idea lies in implementing several filter sections with Bragg gratings that couple back-reflections into a high-order waveguide mode, and connect them by singlemode waveguides that radiate back-reflections propagating in a high-order mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrated Bragg grating filters are an established and widely used technology on the Silicon-on-Insultor (SOI) material platform. They are applied in a large variety of applications, including, optical filtering [1,2], sensing [3], laser cavity feedback [4] and all-optical signal processing [5,6]. A wide range of device geometries have been demonstrated in order to exercise control over the grating optical characteristics, namely the filter bandwidth [7], ripple [8], extinction and dispersion [2,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are applied in a large variety of applications, including, optical filtering [1,2], sensing [3], laser cavity feedback [4] and all-optical signal processing [5,6]. A wide range of device geometries have been demonstrated in order to exercise control over the grating optical characteristics, namely the filter bandwidth [7], ripple [8], extinction and dispersion [2,9,10]. In turn, the optical characteristics of the grating can be designed through the coupling coefficient, κ, and the grating Bragg wavelength, λB, as a function of the propagation length [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%