2022
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2022.13564abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherence Within and Across Categories: The Dynamic Viability of Product Categories on Kickstarter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We argue that the impact of exemplar similarity on analyst evaluations is moderated by two key characteristics of the categories they represent: coherence and distinctiveness (Lo et al 2020, Soublière et al 2022. At a high level, coherence accounts for the internal alignment of category members whereas distinctiveness accounts for the external alignment of the category relative to other categories.…”
Section: Category Coherence and Distinctivenessmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We argue that the impact of exemplar similarity on analyst evaluations is moderated by two key characteristics of the categories they represent: coherence and distinctiveness (Lo et al 2020, Soublière et al 2022. At a high level, coherence accounts for the internal alignment of category members whereas distinctiveness accounts for the external alignment of the category relative to other categories.…”
Section: Category Coherence and Distinctivenessmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We adopt the language of "screening" for the first stage where analysts determine coverage, and "assessment" for the second stage where analysts evaluate and judge firms to produce an investment recommendation. Other scholars have used terms like "categorization and valuation" (Gouvard and Durand 2023), "gaining attention and evaluation" (Hsu 2006), or "classification and valuation" (Soublière et al 2022) to highlight the distinct nature of each stage. stocks yielded an average annual abnormal gross return of 4.13 percent, while a portfolio of least recommended stocks yielded an abnormal return of -4.91 percent.…”
Section: Security Analyst Evaluations Through the Two-stage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations